this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
166 points (96.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5394 readers
667 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7
166
Stonehenge covered in powder paint by Just Stop Oil protesters - BBC News (www.bbc.co.uk)
submitted 6 months ago by sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to c/climate
100 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

They haven’t damaged anything. They just bait the news into writing publicity for the cause and it works because people believing “they damage an artifact” generates clicks.

People have publicly killed themselves to to make people pay attention to the biggest challenge humanity has ever faced.

Such is unaffective because news doesn't cover it.

The chemicals in our rain from industrial waste that will wash these stones clean, do way more damage. But you don’t know that because not enough people talk about it.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Would agree if this wasn't the first time, and if it wasn't that actual art has been damaged to get attention.

Destruction of art or historical sites will NOT save the world. It'll piss people off and push them to vote for right wing politicians that will dismantle even more environmental protections