this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
531 points (91.3% liked)

linuxmemes

21627 readers
219 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] aliteral@lemmy.world 141 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    These people who hate GIMP didn't really practice with it all that much. I use for my day job, editing photos and making content for marketplaces. It works very well. The workflow may be different to PS, yes, but that does not make GIMP bad. Also, for those who hate the UI, two things. First, why don't you help the dev team? And second, we'll have GTK3 support soon (finally).

    [–] at_an_angle@lemmy.one 75 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    I tried. I really tried to like GIMP. The main reason I don't like it is because it's trying so hard to be a professional picture editor and the UI.

    Why can't I deselect things? Why does something need to be selected at all times? Let me just click a button and remove the selection outline and deselect things.

    No. I won't help the dev team because I can't code to save my ass. I turn wrenchs and fix things for a living.

    I use other, simpler pic editors. Why should I learn to fly a Boeing 747 when a Cessna 172 will get me where I need to go? I'm making a shit post once every three months, not professional art.

    [–] qaz@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    You can deselect all with CTRL + SHIFT + A and deselect a specific part by changing the selection mode from replace or additive to subtract.

    [–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

    imagine locking deselection behind a keybind nobody will know about

    [–] kspatlas@lemm.ee 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

    It's literally at the top of the select menu

    [–] UnityDevice@startrek.website 5 points 6 months ago

    Everyone just confirming aliteral's point.

    [–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

    interesting, i guess i just never checked.

    i always just left clicked outside of the selection box to deselect

    [–] umbraroze@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    When I was learning about GIMP key shortcuts I was like "Ctrl+A selects everything, Ctrl+Shift+A deselects everything. Makes sense."

    And then I went to most of the other apps. "Ctrl+D? Well it's one less keypress, but... WHY?"

    To be fair, I get it now, I've used plenty of image editors and I remember the keybinds wherever I am. Just that I sometimes find it annoying that The Other Software hasn't adopted logical keybindings.

    (I find it particularly annoying that a lot of image editors try to be fancy and sophisticated and Photoshop-compatible and think it's at all appropriate to use Ctrl+NumpadPlus and Ctrl+NumpadMinus for zooming. Just use what GIMP uses! NumpadPlus and NumpadMinus. It's not hard! What are you using the plain plus and minus for, anyway? Absolutely nothing! I just checked, I need to use Ctrl in Affinity Photo. Plain plus and minus are useless. I see you. ...oh I can just rebind these. Done.)

    [–] GTG3000@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

    I just change certain keybinds to be GIMP-like whenever I switch drawing programs.

    N is the pencil, CTRL-SHIFT-A is deselect. There's something else, but I can't remember right now.

    [–] irreticent@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

    Do you know of any good video tutorials? There are so many I don't know where to start. I tried one and it seemed too fast paced and not that helpful.

    [–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    GIMP is bad. If the problem was simply that it was "different to PS" then other apps like Krita and Affinity Photo would have the same reputation.

    If a user goes looking for a tool or feature and it's not in the first place they look, that's a problem of "didn't really practice that much". If experienced people need to look up how to do basic operations and their reaction is "that's fucking stupid", then the software is bad.

    To then say "well why don't you help the Dev team then" is insane. I'm not spending hundreds of hours digging GIMP out of bad design decisions when I could just use better software and I haven't seen any evidence that my PR would even be accepted.

    Nobody needs excuses and apologism, they need Blender for image editing and GIMP just isn't that.

    [–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    I mean, I've been using GIMP as my primary photo editor for...over a decade. When I use other programs, nothing is where I expect it to be and I think "well, that's fucking stupid"

    [–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago (8 children)

    Have you thought about applying for a job at Adobe and fixing it?

    load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    So you open any other image editor, click the rectangle select button, draw a rectangle, then select a move button beside the rectangle select tool, then it moves the rectangle you just selected and you think "That's fucking stupid, it should've moved the entire image, not the rectangle I just selected!"

    Really?

    [–] Norodix@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Yes, really. If my move tool is set to layer move, dont change it just because I used the select tool for something completely unrelated. That is the typical dumbed down big colorful button approach that I hate in modern corporate software.

    [–] Liz@midwest.social 7 points 6 months ago

    I feel like my tools should work together instead of having their parameters set individually. If I select something, it's because I want to do stuff with it. Imagine hitting play on a video and then also having to hit play on the audio.

    [–] 0xD@infosec.pub -3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    Look, that you're used to the garbage UI doesn't change that it's garbage and in dire need of a fundamental revamp. If almost everyone here (and everywhere else) says that it sucks or is intransparent, then YOU may be the odd one out here ;)

    Imagine hating usable software you don't need a PhD for. It's kinda pathetic to make this your point of pride.

    [–] umbraroze@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

    I've been using GIMP since the very dawn, I use plenty of other image editors for variety of reasons (Affinity Photo, DxO PhotoLab, ArtRage, Clip Studio), and I have no problems with the UIs in any of them.

    Yet every time I use Adobe software I'm like "why is it doing this? Why is it designed this way? Who thought that was a good idea? This is stupid."

    [–] jose1324@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

    'help the dev team' is a lunatics response. I use Linux but fuck the users man.

    [–] AAA@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    It's a bit lunatic, but it's arguably the only way forward. GIMP doesn't have a multi billion dollar company behind - only volunteers.

    Expecting the developers to have the capacity and skill to emulate the features and looks of Photoshop (and quickly, please) - in their free time - is even more lunatic.

    [–] jose1324@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

    I'm not expecting anything. But if your response to genuine criticism is "fix it urself in the code lol" then fuck off

    [–] AAA@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago
    [–] puchaczyk@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    I'm just glad they added non destructive editing in the latest version. I've tried to rotate/resize something in gimp before and it was a chore to keep quality acceptable.

    [–] aliteral@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

    That is great indeed. And it's nearing 3.0!

    [–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    I think what burns people the most is that after Photoshop 5 or so, GIMP stopped keeping up with all the improvements in the later Photoshop versions. People making the jump from 2024 Photoshop to 1996 Photoshop UI/UX are gonna have a bad time.

    Edit: as a software developer I can say that I've never seen a user more frustrated, sometimes even irrationally so, when they are forced to re-learn muscle memory to perform a familiar task. I've also seen people practically riot at the mere suggestion that this will happen. If you wish to curry favor with your userbase, never ever, remove keyboard accelerators, move toolbars around, break workflow, etc.

    [–] BlessedDog@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

    Had to learn Gimp in 4th or 6th grade, not sire which one it was, pretty comfortable with it, though I admit, it can be frustrating sometimes.

    [–] TheHowTM@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I know it's a consequence of open source development, but I just absolutely despise the file picker. Everything else is dreamy.

    [–] renzev@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

    Everything else is dreamy.

    Gimp spolied me. Now every time I'm forced to use a GUI app with lots of dropdown menu items, I get irrationally angry that I can't just hit / to search through them like I can in gimp lol.

    [–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

    Blender changed it to just start typing one or two minor versions ago. There's certainly stuff I have no idea how to find in the menus because F3 is way more convenient than remembering things (just be aware that you still need to be in the right mode for stuff to show up).

    [–] aliteral@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    Why? Genuinely curious about what is wrong with it.

    [–] renzev@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    Maybe they dislike the filepicker because it doesn't support icon view, only list view (just like the standard gtk filepicker)? I remember a while back lots of people were getting their panties in a twist over it, it was a huge meme in the gnome hater community.

    [–] AProfessional@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    GIMP could fix that today if they just used the filepicker portal. Otherwise once they get to GTK4.

    [–] renzev@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

    Honestly filepickers are kinda cringe, no matter what display mode it uses. I just have a shortcut that basically does find ~ | dmenu | xargs dragon-drop (well, the script itself is a little more complicated, but that's the gist of it) so I can just search for files and drop them into the filepicker directly. Hopefully once everything switches to xdg-portal, someone can make a "filepicker" implementation that just does something like that directly.

    [–] Ascend910@lemmy.ml 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Please teach to how draw good circles and eclipse And how to resize sollection by corner

    [–] renzev@lemmy.world 42 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

    good circles and eclipse

    I assume "eclipse" is a typo of ellipse? Anyway, just use the ellipse select tool (keybind: e) to make a selection in the shape that you want, then fill it in with the bucket tool (b). Hold shift while using the bucket tool to fill in the entire selection, ignoring anything that's drawn inside it. If you want to draw a ring rather than a completely filled circle, use the "border" command from the "select" dropdown menu to replace the ellipse/circle selection with its border.

    how to resize selection by corner

    I'm curious, what is your usecase for this? I've never had to do it myself. But if I had to, here's how I would do it: first, convert the seleciton to a path. Make sure the path is visible from the "Paths" dialog (you have to explicitly show the paths dialog using the "window > dockable dialogs" option. From then on, you can use any of the usual transform tools (perspective, resize, roate, etc) on the path. You just have to select the path icon under "Transform: " in the "tool properties" dialog to make sure you're transforming the path, not a pixel layer. Once you've transformed the path to your liking, you can turn it back to a selection, fill it with color, or stroke it with a brush by right-clicking on it in the "layers" dialog.

    Also, bonus tip: never use the dropdown menus, it's a huge waste of time. Just press / to pull up for the command palette and search for the tool you need.

    EDIT: I love lovingly ranting about gimp, I can do it four hours on end. I'm not some sort of gimp guru, but I know a thing or two. If anyone has any more questions, feel free to reply to this comment and I'll do my best to give advice.

    [–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    You learn this by messing around or did you follow some guide?

    [–] renzev@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    Combination of both I guess? Like for the second one I found out that you can convert between selections and paths a long time ago just by stumbling upon the menu entry for it, but I had to look up how to apply transformations to paths

    [–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 months ago

    Not op, but if I'm trying to rectangle select something, I sometimes get it close on the first try but not exactly right, so instead of trying to redraw the selection or use additive/subtractive selections, it is more intuitive to me to try and resize the selection box.

    I had to use PS for school recently and it's nice that it supports this use case, although I did have to search for a guide to learn how to do it.

    [–] kspatlas@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

    Use the select tool to create an ellipse selection and go to Edit->Fill with foreground colour

    [–] uis@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago
    [–] FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    help the dev team

    And we wonder why people don’t like using Linux or FOSS software.

    [–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 6 months ago

    That's their prerogative. FLOSS is a communal effort of equals. Users are not customers; not entitled to anything as it's donated freely. If you want to be bannied and not contribute, there's proprietary software out there but they'll exact a price (currently more than just financial).