this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
385 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59038 readers
4507 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
385
Hollywood's 'Groundbreaking' AI Proposal for Actors Is a Nightmare (gizmodo.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
46 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

SAG-AFTRA said that AMPTP's AI plan included scanning background actors and using their likenesses "for the rest of eternity."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lauchs@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I agree with the actors but this article isn't great.

Actors, writers, and multimedia artists are all having their jobs threatened because of low-return, high-yield AI and generative products that do not have the ability to replicate human work and should not be utilized in order to do so.

If AI can't replicate human work then there wouldn't be a problem. If the AI were terrible, products made with it would be as well.

The entire fear is that AI can (or will soon be able to) do a decent job at these tasks.

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

AI being insufficient is temporary, the question is how temporary.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

You're right that it'll get better, but I agree it likely won't be the same as a human. The difference is it'll cost nothing in comparison. That's the threat. If they can get the job done 80% as well with a fraction of 1% of the cost, they're probably taking it. They don't want to use AI because it's just as good or better, but because it's a hell of a lot cheaper.