this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
341 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3023 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not sure why you’re being downvoted so much, it’s an interesting point. If you make it too cheap and it has a lot of side effects, you are t really saving anyone money. You’re not even improving their health in the long run.

That being said, I have no idea how bad the long term effects are.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Except it does seem rather odd to keep a medicine from people whose lives it could save (obesity causes a lot more problems than diabetes), because someone somewhere might try to abuse it. Frankly, if you want to voluntarily abuse a drug, great. My interest is in relieving the suffering caused by obesity, not protecting people from the Darwin awards.

Imagine saying that “insulin should be expensive because some people use it for suicide and it has side-effects.”

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I didn’t think it was an abuse of the medication, I thought the comment was just discussing side effects and potential complications from regular use of it

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

There is a lot abuse. Wealthy people shop around for doctors to prescribe because they want to lose weight with a shot.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It's more than a shot. It changes your appetite.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It’s a shot that changes your appetite (among other effects). Not sure why what I said contradicts that or implies otherwise.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world -5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, and has practically no side effects. They should consider putting it in the water supply.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Please tell me you aren’t one of those anti-fluoride people.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I just suggested putting a medicine in the water supply. Why would I be against putting a mineral in the water supply?

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well for starters, ozempic does have common adverse side effects. So that’s one major difference.

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So does fluoride... It turns your teeth brown.

It's just that collectively, as a society, we decided that brown teeth are better than cavity riddled teeth.

So the intended effect's value outweighs the negative side effects.

Exactly like semaglutide.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Nope I am not engaging with this nonsense. Fluoride is perfectly safe in the water supply. Nobody batted an eye until the right latched onto it as another stupid culture war masking as concerns over personal health. Stop watching xXJoeFreedomXx videos and listen to health professionals. That’s all I’m saying on the matter and it’s for the benefit of onlookers more than you.

Have a good rest of your week.

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Hey buddy... You're the one spouting damned nonsense.

I was attempting to help educate you.

Look it the fuck up.

I don't get my knowledge from YouTube and I suggest you stop trying to do so yourself.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You are being duped.

The brown spots are purely cosmetic and a minor trade off for the benefits.

Now I’m actually done. The fact that mom‘s for liberty is the biggest force behind this ridiculous “movement“ should indicate to you how bullshit it is.

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's exactly what the fuck I said... I literally never mentioned anything about it being "unsafe"... Only that it was one well known side effect of fluoride being in our water.

You're just not paying attention to what I said because you want to defend your silly position so badly.

FWIW, the most commonly known side effects of semaglutide aren't particularly dangerous either (and in fact, most are more temporary than brown teeth).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dental_fluorosis

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Stop muddying the waters for an internet gotcha moment. God what an asshole. Blocking

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Do you need help figuring out how to find that block button?

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And as a result, only the wealthy should be able to afford it?

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That’s not what I said. I’m saying we don’t want this being widely available and prescribed like tic tacs because people think it’ll make them look like a magazine cover. The side effects can be considerable. A doctor needs to be involved if you think you need ozempic, although sadly many are all too happy to rubber stamp it. Still, it’s being used as a shortcut by many and it’s not good for them.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

If a doctor prescribes it for real reasons I respect that but right now it’s a celebrity weight loss “hack”

My friend has had 3 patients walk because she won’t prescribe ozempic to them. They are not obese or have some major medical consideration. They want to use it as a substitute for a diet that they don’t even really need.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The whole prescription system is a rent-seeking scheme that enriches various middlemen, including your friend.

How far have we fallen as a civilization that people have to meekly seek permission to take drugs? Bodily autonomy doesn’t extend to medicine, is that it? The unfathomable hypocrisy.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don’t think it’s perfect but I can’t agree with people being able to walk around buying any medication at anytime without any oversight.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So are you a religious authoritarian or a garden variety fascist that you feel entitled to dictate to me what I can and cannot do with my body?

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  1. no clue how this is religious, which also I am not

  2. so you’re down for people to grab oxy off the shelf I take it?

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Why not? Is addiction illegal? At most I'd say education about the medication should be more available.

Edit obviously addiction is terrible but it's a slippery slope to say " you can't take this drug because of addiction risks" into "you can't take this drug because I find it morally wrong"

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

There are compounding pharmacies in every major city in the US who can provide generic versions of these medicines.

They're not going to be covered by insurance that way and they're typically still not cheap exactly but they are cheaper than the brand names and available as an oral medication in addition to the self administered weekly shots.

The only "shortage" has been of the proprietary injectors used by the major brand names.