this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
86 points (98.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5178 readers
725 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7
86
Warfare’s Climate Emissions Are Huge but Uncounted (www.scientificamerican.com)
submitted 4 months ago by solo to c/climate
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] perestroika 4 points 4 months ago

Interestingly, warfare also has the effect of:

  • causing houses to be abandoned, necessitating houses elsewhere while the abandoned ones likely get bombed

  • decreasing the number of future consumers, whose future footprint would depend on future behaviour patterns (hard to predict)

  • changing future land use patterns, either due to unexploded ordnance or straight out chemical contamination (there are places in France that are still off limits to economic activity, because World War I contaminated the soil with toxic chemicals), here in Estonia there are still forests from which you don't want trees in your sawmill because they contain shrapnel and bullets from World War II

I have the feeling that calculating the climate impact of actual war is a difficult job.

But they could calculate the tonnage of spent fuel and energy, that would be easier.