this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
372 points (91.7% liked)

News

23268 readers
2710 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

More efficient manufacturing, falling battery costs and intense competition are lowering sticker prices for battery-powered models to within striking distance of gasoline cars.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It's not a hard limit, it's a variable capacity reduction over a decade that estimates a maximum 50% reduction in range, similar to the lost efficiency of an ICE engine as the tubes , pipes and cases erode.

You add in the far lower fuel/repair/ maintenance costs and that optional new battery is costing you less than you're paying in gasoline, oil changes or other basic and common maintenance.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I drove Camry for 15 years with minimal repairs and after 180k miles I was still getting roughly the same mpg and range as when it was new. It was still going fine when I got rid of it becuae our vehicle needs changed, but even if it hadn't a complete engine rebuild at 300k (if needed) would only be a few thousand dollars or less.

Working down to half the range over a decade and then needing a very expensive repalacement battery is not comparable in any way. I really hope the battery tech keeps improving.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's comparable in that optional battery maintenance is currently the same price as the average cost of repairs you made on your Camry plus the cost of gas for a decade.

Even if battery tech weren't simultaneously improving and getting cheaper every couple of months, ev costs are already at least comparable with ICEs.

As battery tech improves and efficiency rises, the price is going to keep getting cheaper.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I wasn't talking about cost, I was talking about the ability to travel a comparable range on a charge. Does battery maintenance keep it at 95% of the original range at 15 years?

Less maintenance and cheaper charging is actually a selling point for electric cars, and I am not disagreeing with that. But a used 15 year old car that has a far lower range than new and will most likely need a new expensive battery replacment within a few years is not the same as a 15 year old car that performs like new and won't need a massive repair in the near future.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No more than ICEs stay at 95% of the original range at 15 years.

Your argument is based on accepting a hypothetical best case scenario for a random ICE to the worst case scenario for a random EV.

"A used 15-year-old ICE car with a cracked head gasket isn't the same compared to an electric car that's managed to retain near its full capacity".

No, of course it isn't.

EVs are already cheaper over time, are already comparable at MSRP, and their range and efficiency isn't static like ICE cars.

Range anxiety is real, but it boils down to anxiety; range is still there and only improving.

Shoot, the aptera is going to recharge passively from solar 40 miles a day, and they have thousand mile ranges on a charge.

In fuel costs alone, an EV owner is saving about $1,000 a year.

After a decade, you can get that extra 20% capacity back with a new battery for cheaper than you would have been spending on your ICE car that cannot be refurbished in the same way.

Just adds up.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No more than ICEs stay at 95% of the original range at 15 years.

Your argument is based on accepting a hypothetical best case scenario for a random ICE to the worst case scenario for a random EV.

Based on my last two cars apparently being hypothetical best case scenarios, sure.

I look forward to electric cars range continuing to improve, but as long as I live somewhere that range actually matters half of the year I'll take the current ranges as they work in reality into consideration.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Naturally.

Most people appreciate innovation after it becomes common rather than when it becomes practical.

If your 15-year-old cars have the same MPG and have never needed a repair, yes, your cars are performing to a degree that has never been recorded.

[–] eltrain123@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’ve got 112k miles on my Tesla and still get over 250miles on a full charge, and that’s not running it to empty… just as far as I push it on a road trip. I could probably make it 275-285 easy. Never had a problem with range and have had minimal maintenance costs compared to all of the ICE vehicles I drove over 20years I drove ‘em.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] eltrain123@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Thanks! It’s been great since I left the ICE world. I can only hope to help others take the leap!