this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
174 points (93.9% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

1630 readers
44 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

TL;DR:

  • Alcohol $7.8b
  • All illicits: $1.8b
  • Meth: $0.365b

I wanted a figure for cannabis and found this from 2020:

PDF https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/publications/the-nz-illicit-drug-harm-index-2020-10-feb.pdf

  • All illicits: $1.9b
  • Meth: $0.824b
  • Cannabis: $0.911

I notice that the per kilograms measure for harm is also useful to account for volume of usage, but think that per 'dose' would be better.

  • Meth: $1.1m per kg with 743kg consumption
  • Cannabis: $0.35m per kg with 58000kg consumption

These figures include 'associative crime' as harm. So it apparent counts the cost of buying it as harm, it also counts the tax loss of that expenditure, so IMHO it skews unfavourabley to higher expenditure. But put that aside.

These figures show that all illicit drugs combined are less harmful to society than alcohol, and tautologically the harm is inflated by illegality.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I promise you that meth would cause far more problems if it was consumed anywhere near the frequency of alcohol. Anyone who has watched someone destroy their lives with meth knows just how dangerous and damaging it is. The scariest part is the speed at which it can happen. People destroy their lives with alcohol too, but it usually takes decades. I've watched people become hollow shells of their former selves, completely unrecognizable, and standing on death's doorstep, within six months of their first usage of methamphetamine. It's a destructive, dirty, dangerous drug.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure the police aren't saying let's sell meth at dairies, rather they are asking for more funding for alcohol harm reduction.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Statement retracted because I'm in the wrong community.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Check which community you're in. We have our own police problems but tanks aren't one of them.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Also are Russian and Chinese police as famous for gunning down their citizens as the US? That comment was just all over the place, and I'm still not sure what country TexasDrunk was referencing..

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

TexasDrunk was drunk and didn't check the community. Statement has been retracted.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I'm not certain that's better. We would like to hear your reasoning so that we can understand other communities better.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Our police don't shoot drunks they just beat the shit out them.

[–] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

Especially the homeless and homeless veterans.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 3 months ago

The core of the argument is that we should be spending proportionate amounts on harm mitigation or prevention.