this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
201 points (93.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43831 readers
836 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So my company decided to migrate office suite and email etc to Microsoft365. Whatever. But for 2FA login they decided to disable the option to choose "any authenticator" and force Microsoft Authenticator on the (private) phones of both employees and volunteers. Is there any valid reason why they would do this, like it's demonstrably safer? Or is this a battle I can pick to shield myself a little from MS?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 87 points 5 months ago (2 children)

No company has any right to force people to use their private phones for company purposes. I'd absolutely refuse to let them install anything whatsoever on my phone. If they want me to use a phone for work, they'll have to give me one.

[–] tdgoodman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Many work places require employees to bring their own tools (eg auto mechanic). Requiring a phone or tablet is probably legal.

[–] thesystemisdown@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I think if that's the case, I'd get an inexpensive phone with a prepaid plan... and make it clear that it gets turned off if not on call or otherwise pre-arranged.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

This is what it's heading to eventually. This "authentication using a personal device that the IT department can't control" crap will eventually evolve into "they must control the device". Which means they just need to quit being cheap and buy devices they can manage for this purpose.

[–] IIII@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Or leave it in the office, always on charge, and with no lock screen so anyone can take the phone and accept a request

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That sounds like a terrible security practice but at least it only puts your company at risk

[–] sleep_deprived@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

That's the point. Malicious compliance.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

The app will enforce a lock screen.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That sounds like a terrible security practice but at least it only puts your company at risk

[–] itsralC@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You should get your lemmy checked for dementia

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 2 points 5 months ago

I think my instance is having an issue

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

No need for a prepaid plan I haven't used the MS authentication but almost all 2FA apps actually don't need Internet access (apart from the initial setup). I would just graph some old phone and connect it to WiFi.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 3 points 5 months ago
[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

No company has any right to force people to use their private phones for company purposes.

Got a reputable source on that one that’s valid for all 50 states?

[–] englislanguage@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 months ago

"Diplomjodler" sounds German so probably different laws apply…