this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
172 points (96.2% liked)

Games

32549 readers
2253 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 53 points 6 months ago (2 children)

So Redfall was set up to fail, and you make those people fall on the sword, and then Hi-Fi Rush is a game people clearly want more of and could have stood to cost more than $30, and you let those people go too instead of hitting the ground running on a sequel? What is wrong with you, Microsoft?

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The same thing wrong with all capitalists.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I'd expect a capitalist to iterate on a thing people liked, which is cheaper than what it cost to make it the first time, to make and sell more of it.

[–] Starkstruck@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Alas, modern corporations are a fucking mad house, where sometimes not even the most profitable solution gets chosen cause 'risk' or whatever.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Stop having such high expectations. They're capitalists, not video game makers. The money is the ONLY point.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think my expectations are pretty damn low, and Microsoft is still coming in below them. Moves this dumb are actively against their best interests.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 5 points 6 months ago

The way they see it, their best interests don't involve those of the game studio. Buying a studio does two things. It gives them a new business to latch onto and suck all the money out of quickly, and it eliminates competition in the gaming industry. Killing the studio still meets both of those goals. And then they just move onto the next one.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I mean, yeah, if you're expecting intelligent long term decisions, those expectations are still too high.

Remember: This is the group of people STILL actively trying to cover up anthropogenic climate change. Something that not only threatens their long term profitability, but literally threatens the planet with extinction.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Going by MS‘s track record the last couple decades, it‘s all business as usual. It‘s expected from them to eventually close everything down they incorporate into their ecosystem. Sometimes after draining it or letting it rot away, and sometimes sooner than later.