this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
410 points (98.3% liked)

World News

32326 readers
846 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The United States House of Representatives has overwhelmingly passed a bill that would expand the federal definition of anti-Semitism, despite opposition from civil liberties groups.

The bill passed the House on Wednesday by a margin of 320 to 91, and it is largely seen as a reaction to the ongoing antiwar protests unfolding on US university campuses. It now goes to the Senate for consideration.

If the bill were to become law, it would codify a definition of anti-Semitism created by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

IHRA’s working definition of anti-Semitism is “a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities”.

According to the IHRA, that definition also encompasses the “targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity”.

The group also includes certain examples in its definition to illustrate anti-Semitism. Saying, for instance, that “the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor” would be deemed anti-Semitic under its terms. The definition also bars any comparison between “contemporary Israeli policy” and “that of the Nazis”.

Rights groups, however, have raised concerns the definition nevertheless conflates criticism of the state of Israel and Zionism with anti-Semitism.

In a letter sent to lawmakers on Friday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) urged House members to vote against the legislation, saying federal law already prohibits anti-Semitic discrimination and harassment.

“Instead, it would likely chill free speech of students on college campuses by incorrectly equating criticism of the Israeli government with anti-Semitism.”

Archive link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Got your cart before the horse: the US controls Israel, the control Israeli lobbyists have over it is secondary to that.

[–] impure9435@kbin.run 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If the US truly controlled Israel, they could force them to comply with UN resolutions, force them to ban settlements or force them into a ceasefire. The US built Israel, but these criminals are now strong enough not to have to listen to the US or anyone, not even the UN or the ICC.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If the US truly controlled Israel, they could force them to comply with UN resolutions, force them to ban settlements or force them into a ceasefire.

Could, but why would they want to? They have a little buddy doing their dirty work for them.

[–] impure9435@kbin.run 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

How does the US benefit from Israel committing a genocide?

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Does the US benefit from stopping them?

[–] impure9435@kbin.run 0 points 6 months ago

Yes. War always has a negative impact on the economy, and trust me, if the US care about one thing, then that is money.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

The oil, the real estate?