this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
410 points (98.3% liked)

World News

32326 readers
846 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The United States House of Representatives has overwhelmingly passed a bill that would expand the federal definition of anti-Semitism, despite opposition from civil liberties groups.

The bill passed the House on Wednesday by a margin of 320 to 91, and it is largely seen as a reaction to the ongoing antiwar protests unfolding on US university campuses. It now goes to the Senate for consideration.

If the bill were to become law, it would codify a definition of anti-Semitism created by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

IHRA’s working definition of anti-Semitism is “a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities”.

According to the IHRA, that definition also encompasses the “targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity”.

The group also includes certain examples in its definition to illustrate anti-Semitism. Saying, for instance, that “the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor” would be deemed anti-Semitic under its terms. The definition also bars any comparison between “contemporary Israeli policy” and “that of the Nazis”.

Rights groups, however, have raised concerns the definition nevertheless conflates criticism of the state of Israel and Zionism with anti-Semitism.

In a letter sent to lawmakers on Friday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) urged House members to vote against the legislation, saying federal law already prohibits anti-Semitic discrimination and harassment.

“Instead, it would likely chill free speech of students on college campuses by incorrectly equating criticism of the Israeli government with anti-Semitism.”

Archive link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 56 points 6 months ago (4 children)
[–] Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Always the same map

A bit surprising that "israel" didn't vote against it, but that would be a bit too on the nose I guess.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Whiteness index map

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wild to me that China is not a part of "core world trade"

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 months ago

China didn't colonize the world like western Europe and Japan did, then make neocolonial institutions like the IMF and World Bank to preserve those colonial relations.

They've mostly escaped colonialism and become the manufacturing hub of the world now, but wealth isn't being extracted from the Global South / "former" colonies to China like they are being transferred to the imperial Core.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Always the same map

[–] mihor@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

Looks like a goddamn Risk map.