this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
202 points (81.8% liked)

Linux

47952 readers
1795 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LittleWizard@feddit.de 9 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Does this mean you have to use apt-get to get the deb version again? Or is there an even more complicated command? I'm wondering what happens for the other Ubuntu flavors. I'm usually running Kubuntu.

[–] tmjaea@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Even apt is deliberately broken:

"[If] You use 'sudo apt install chromium', you get a Snap package of Chromium instead of Debian"

[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 28 points 6 months ago (4 children)

This was where I rage quit. Who in the hell thought it was a good idea?

[–] Hubi@feddit.de 14 points 6 months ago

Same here, it's the reason why I kicked Ubuntu off my laptop. They removed any way to choose and made it such a pain to get around the Snap bullshit. I'm on Linux because I want to choose what I do with my system.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Who in the hell thought it was a good idea?

Marc Shuttleworth

[–] technom@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I have serious doubts about that due to the role of early Ubuntu in popularizing desktop Linux. For many including me, Ubuntu was the first taste of GNU/Linux and it was a breath of fresh air compared to the contemporary clumsy and cumbersome distros like Fedora. Only Ubuntu from those days has any resemblance to the experience we expect from desktop Linux today.

The problems at Canonical seems like a systemic institutional issue, probably related to egotistic management with temper issues. That of course means that Shuttleworth is the source of those personality disorders. But still...

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I have serious doubts about that due to the role of early Ubuntu in popularizing desktop Linux.

Ubuntu didn't move overall Linux market share at all. It just took the "gateway drug" role from Mandrake/Mandriva.

[–] odc@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It is a good idea. Imagine you are completely new to Ubuntu and want to install chromium. You're gonna search on Google how to do that and you will probably find an old article telling you to use APT. If ‘sudo apt install chromium’ did not work it would be very frustrating.

Only reason it wouldn't work is Canonical killing the .deb package. That was an unforced error. So no, still not a good idea.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Seriously? Wow. That moves the whole thing into asshole territory. I'm glad I went with a distro that prioritizes not being shitty.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.de 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why does this break apt? Just because, I assume (I am using Debian btw), it installs a placeholder deb-package which, while running the postinst script, installs chromium via snap commands?

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It doesn’t break apt, apt just prefers snaps now.

This is as they designed it.

The issue here is that people don’t like this other thing and so the distribution which has been moving towards this other thing for like a decade now I guess is the bad guy for continuing to work towards that goal.

[–] Emma_Gold_Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It doesn’t break apt, Canonical just broke their version of apt ~~just~~ to prefer snaps now.

FTFY

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago

OK, so it's actually apt itself that's different on Ubuntu, not just fake/virtual/transitional deb packages in their repos.

[–] flynnguy@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago

Same with firefox

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Canonical even patched apt a bit so it prefers to install snaps first.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago

That really pissed me off in 2018

[–] llothar@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It is about installing .deb that you manually downloaded from somewhere. You can't install them by double clicking on them, you have to install from command line.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 2 points 6 months ago

You absolutely could in the past.