One of these days a Corp is going to push hard enough they get their rights stripped away for not meeting the 'to promote the progress of science and useful arts' part of the copyright clause and i'm starting to wonder if the big N is going to be the winner.

[–] MamboGator@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago

Kinda like when Warner Music Group tried to strong arm the world over "Happy Birthday" but when they were finally challenged on it in court it was ruled that they never actually owned the copyright.

[–] windie@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

[–] OsaErisXero@kbin.run 24 points 6 months ago

Ya gotta remember that at its inception, at least in the US, copyright had 2 things going for it:

The duration was limited to 14 years, not the death of the author +95 or fucking whatever it is currently, and that much of that duration would need to get burnt up in duplication and distribution of the work, all of which had significant costs associated with it. Hundred year long guarantees with unlimited instant reproduction of a work and instant mass distribution functionally for free would have been anathema at the time, and this kind of abuse of the system goes directly counter to the original as-written intent.

Too bad those 'originalists' in the courts only use that concept to suppress women and minorities instead of maybe picking up a small W with it here.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Lol, those rules are for you, not for Nintendo.

[–] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I actually feel like if Nintendo keeps this up, ar some point down the road, a majority of people are just gonna be done with them.