this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2024
270 points (98.9% liked)

World News

38978 readers
3588 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Russia is recruiting female convicts to boost its military forces, a Ukrainian intelligence spokesperson said.
  • Moscow wants to recruit the convicts to auxiliary and combat roles, the Kyiv Post reported.
  • More than 100,000 convicts from Russian penal colonies have reportedly been conscripted to fight in Ukraine.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 46 points 6 months ago (2 children)

So on the surface, it's more people to die in Ukraine, which is sad. On the other hand, one of the reasons women traditionally don't serve in armies is because if you need 100 kids to be born in 9 months, that can come from one single guy, but it can only come from 100 women. Something to consider in a country that is in a demographic crisis already.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 30 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They may end up serving in a different role than you may be assuming.

Making a corps of childbearering women under military supervision would be very dystopian, but also kinda in-character for Putin and the Russian government’s trajectory lately.

[–] tzrlk@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Don't need a corps; just note that pregnant women get sent to the rear and let things sort themselves out.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Putin has no long term strategy. It's all about surviving the next day. Russia will be paying the price for decades to come, though.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 26 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It would be naive to think that. Dugin, his ideologue, wrote a book on their long term geopolitical strategy, of which Brexit, and funding US racists was a part of.

He made a massive miscalculation on the combat effectiveness of both the Russian and Ukrainian armies, which was a heavy blow to those goals, though. Let's hope it was a big enough mistake.

[–] exanime@lemmy.today 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He made a massive miscalculation on the combat effectiveness of both the Russian and Ukrainian armies

More like, he was counting on Trump's second term. If that had taken place, there would be no Ukraine now

It may still happen but hopefully the damage is done by now

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There is that of course, but I don't want to discount Ukraine here. From 2014 to 2022, everyone, including the West and Ukraine has meekly resigned not to escalate to open warfare after the start of the invasion. In 2022, during the first 3 days, Putin expected Kyiv to fall in three days, and so did the whole world. But it didn't. It's the kind of shit that will have Zelenskyy streets named after him around the world, while Putin will have as much share in the public consciousness as any of the Mongolian khans whose names historians quote as fun trivia, but not much else.

At this point, Russians are cursing the name of Gorbachev for the fall of the USSR, but in 50 years, they will be cursing the name of Putin for the fall of Russia.

[–] exanime@lemmy.today 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I hope you are right and that they go so far out hating Putin that they'll never allow another repeat....

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't see them hating Putin for the same reasons you, or I would. They would hate Putin because he lost.

[–] exanime@lemmy.today 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I hope I am right and you are wrong... but as I type this reply, my conviction has almost entirely dissipated :-(

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 2 points 6 months ago

At least we share in where our hopes lie, friend

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They may write fantasy books where they are some sort of mythical heroes all day long. That doesn't mean any of this is applicable to reality.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Brexit happened, Trump was (and might be again) president, far right is growing in Europe. Outside of the battlefield, they are quite successful in their war against the West

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 5 points 6 months ago

Social manipulation is something russia is unfortunately quite adept at

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The demographic consequences of Russia's misadventures will continue to echo for decades. The Russian security state has given Russia multiple lobotomies over the last ~100 years and that's more or less how they're able to stay on top of things. The stability they export is only an asset insofar as they don't have the same kind of domestic potential.