Technology

59143 readers

2907 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

185

YouTube moves to AV1 by default to the dismay of some Android users (www.androidpolice.com)

submitted 6 months ago by AnActOfCreation@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Arif Dikici, who is a part of the Android Video and Image Codecs team at Google, recently announced on LinkedIn that Android will now use an AV1 decoder known as “libdav1d,” which was created by the team behind VLC.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hardware decoding is the whole point. Hardware support is notorious for lagging greatly behind software. Desktop support is not great either right now. It makes you wonder what Google's reason is, they have to be aware that must people won't be able to use it properly.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I know hardware decoding is the point. But you can't just wait until every phone on the planet supports it.

Their reason is that it's a massively better format.

[–] hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 6 months ago

But you can't just wait until every phone on the planet supports it.

The proper approach is simply to have the app check the hardware decode capabilities of the device and use the best option. Pretty sure that's what YT has always done for codec transitions in the past.

Forcing AV1 on devices without hardware decode will end up making users think their battery is starting to wear out, even with the better software decoder'

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

...massively better for whom? I mean I understand if they start using it and offering it to devices that support it. But if they push something that needs software decoding when there are other formats that have hardware support it's going to be a shit fest.

Right now AVC (H264) has hardware 4k support and HEVC (H265) has hardware 2k, while AV1 only has 1080p software. What's the point of offering AV1 4k?

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Massively better quality per byte.

You know, the sole purpose of a lossy video codec?

But the licensing is also far better for end consumers.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 3 points 6 months ago

None of that is going to benefit you if your phone barfs its guts trying to decode it. Until you get a phone with hardware support it's going to be purely theoretical. And if Google forces you to decode 720p AV1 in software when you have a perfectly good AVC and HEVC hardware decoder just sitting there is going to be downright stupid.