this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
404 points (96.3% liked)

News

22896 readers
4654 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Colorado’s Democratic-controlled House on Sunday passed a bill that would ban the sale and transfer of semiautomatic firearms, a major step for the legislation after roughly the same bill was swiftly killed by Democrats last year. 

The bill, which passed on a 35-27 vote, is now on its way to the Democratic-led state Senate. If it passes there, it could bring Colorado in line with 10 other states — including California, New York and Illinois — that have prohibitions on semiautomatic guns. 

But even in a state plagued by some of the nation’s worst mass shootings, such legislation faces headwinds.

Colorado’s political history is purple, shifting blue only recently. The bill’s chances of success in the state Senate are lower than they were in the House, where Democrats have a 46-19 majority and a bigger far-left flank. Gov. Jared Polis, also a Democrat, has indicated his wariness over such a ban.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blazera@lemmy.world -5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Guns dont defend shit. We have all the guns, its not going well. A gun ban at least slows down supply. And starts a long path to becoming like developed countries that arent murderous gun nuts like we are.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It’s going better here than it is in Myanmar or Gaza.

How’s that weapons ban going for Gaza?

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Ukraine lets their citizens have weapons now too.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

Tell you what. How about you pass a law to disarm people based on their hateful ideologies FIRST. Make Nazism illegal, then disarm, prosecute, and imprison the neonazis, by force of law. They are currently trying to ignite a new Civil War against America, yet you want to disarm the rest of us in the face of that.

Fix that, then we can discuss disarming law abiding citizens.

You gonna address the question I asked? Cops only use gun bans as an excuse to kill more black people.

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Imagine trusting a neoliberal government to take the guns away from those leftists deem dangerous. You really don't see how that might go awry?

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't see you offering a better suggestion.

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

I didn't think I needed to state the obvious: armed leftists are much more difficult to oppress.

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 2 points 5 months ago

I could go for a law that states something like:

To the degree that you attempt to control or suppress another person or group, you may be controlled or suppressed accordingly.

This is magical law, but we may as well make it mundane law, too.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You actually downvoted the idea of making Nazism illegal. How does that make you feel?

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Like I’m in a different category than the Nazis, who rounded up and murdered Communists and Trade Unionists during the Holocaust.

Read a book dude. History is well-documented.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

And yet you downvoted the suggestion of making Nazism illegal. You've read books, and despite that, still thought that banning Nazism was a bad idea.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think youd have a hard time defining and identifying nazis in legal terms.

And i dont trust any gun owner to be a law abiding citizen, we're all animals that can get very emotional. And we have the results of that in our horrendous homicide rate.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Really? Because Germany managed it. Nazism is illegal there. They prosecute anyone who professes Nazi ideas. I don't care how hard it would be. You think confiscating all the guns is easier?

I don't care who you trust. I care that this nation is too foolish and cowardly to root out the cancer it has harbored since long before it was founded. Ban sympathy for the Confederacy. Ban Nazi ideology. Prosecute those who profess it. Ruin those who fund them. Cleanse the police departments of all the Nazi cops. We will never be free of them until the day we make their ideologies illegal.

Until then, piss off trying to disarm the millions of people who only wish to defend their homes from exactly those people pushing for civil war.

Gee whiz, you sure don't want to address the fact that cops only use gun bans as an excuse to murder black people.

[–] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago

just a heads up, west germany famously integrated nazis into the government and still has them to this day.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I would love to do how Germany does, no one gets a gun.

Most of their nazi ban entails antisemitism, which i dont think covers a lot of people you wouldnt want to have guns. It also entails self labeling nazis, people wearing nazi uniforms, using swastikas, etc. Again, i dont think thats gonna cover most of the people youd want it to. Its better than nothing and id support it here, but its not gonna be very effective at keeping guns away from people with various nazi beliefs.

Gee whiz, you sure don’t want to address the fact that cops only use gun bans as an excuse to murder black people.

What gun bans?

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Every gun ban we've ever passed.

If you want to ban guns, disarm the Nazis first. That's all I ask.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We dont have any gun bans. The countries that do, like Germany, have a lot less cops killing people, including black people. Im saying a sweeping gun ban takes guns away from more people with nazi ideologies than a ban on just self identifying nazis.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

Then you haven't been paying attention.

[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There a better way: if you don't have a valid reason* to have a gun, you can't have it. If you have a valid reason* but not to carry it, you can't carry it and you can only use it in a target range.

  • Hunting, basically.
[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

All I see is you not thinking about anything I've said.

[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Many countries do almost what I said and are safer that the US by far.