this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
372 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59080 readers
4502 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mundane@feddit.nu 124 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Unless you live and travel within the EU. Then you can use your phone as much as you want and know that you won't get a higher bill than usual.

[–] uzay@infosec.pub 54 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Unless you are dangerously close to a non-EU country and can't reliably prevent your phone from connecting to its networks

[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 35 points 6 months ago (1 children)

IMO they should have just made any roaming on non-EU-terms strictly opt-in. It’s madness that you can get billed ridiculous amounts of money just for being too close to a border or ship.

[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Originally it kinda made sense. Kinda hard to juggle through getting a deal with every single carrier everywhere

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

But it doesn't.

If you don't have a deal with the carrier, don't automatically connect to it. That is so dumb, (and it also smells illegal to some degree) cause in some cases it can happen on accident, and paying for things you specifically don't want is a really shakey basis in law.

[–] themadcodger@kbin.earth 16 points 6 months ago

shakes fist at Andorra

[–] mundane@feddit.nu 9 points 6 months ago

Never thought of that. Scary though.

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This time last year I stayed on Bardsey Island, off the Welsh Coast. There's hardly any phone signal on the island, but they warned everyone to turn off roaming on their phones anyway. It turns out that because of the mountain on the island blocking the signal from the UK, lots of phones automatically connect to Irish providers, and cost more than people expect

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It’s weird they wouldn’t work with a UK based telco to set up a relay station explicitly to prevent this.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why prevent it, when you can just shrug your shoulders and rake in the money?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

The telco likely doesnt make any extra from the roaming, they very likely pay it all out to the company the roaming took place on.

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

The island is tiny, and only has about half a dozen houses on it. The visitors are there because it's a nature reserve, so generally don't want to be on their phones anyway. It's not worth setting up a relay station over just telling everyone before they get there.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

I've always been sent a text when I connect to the network of a different country. It happened immediately when I crossed over from France to Monaco, for example.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm always cautious about comparing the US to the EU too closely, but in this case it fits, as both are continent-wide common markets. If you "live and travel within the EU," it barely counts as international travel for economic concerns.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm always cautious about comparing the US to the EU too closely, but in this case it fits, as both are continent-wide common markets.

The rest of North America would like a word with you...

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No more so than Switzerland and the former USSR west of the Urals, I suppose.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

AFAIK, most of the pan-European plans cover the whole Schengen Area (including Switzerland), and the most of the former USSR boarders aren't all that porous, unlike the NAFTA boarders.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 18 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Let's look at landmass - the US is equivalent in landmass to 16 Western OECD countries.

I haven't seen roaming fees in the US for over 20 years. So you could travel 2500 miles and not once pay a roaming fee. Same with SMS - all messages have been included in my plan since at least 2005.

It's hard to compare EU to US with something like roaming. Very few Americans travel outside the US regularly, so we'd need to look at something like hours outside home area per year, or something, to be any kind of useful - and there's zero roaming within the US.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Also, you can go to Alaska/Hawaii and not pay roaming. Some plans include Mexico and Canada as well.

Yup. My wife went to Canada for a few days, so I bought a roaming plan. $20 and we were set. Yeah, that kinda sucks, but I've only needed to do that once.

If we go on a long trip somewhere, we'll probably get a SIM, but it just doesn't come up often.

[–] Beryl@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Beware of Switzerland !