this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
746 points (99.9% liked)

196

16503 readers
2455 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Unpopular opinion: any magitech that works according to consistent rules is just "tech."

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 7 months ago

Well yeah, but by the same logic i 100% consider our real actual physics to just be magic, at the smallest scale there is absolutely absurd stuff like wave-particle duality and LITERAL ACTUAL GENUINE TELEPORTATION.

And of course there's the old quote "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic".

I don't think the distinguishment between "magic" and "technology" is particularly useful, what's important is whether the reader goes "ooooh that's so fucking cool", and you can totally get that from youtube videos by people working with particle physics.

You can't convince me that using ruby rods surrounded in flash tube and reflective materials to create lasers isn't magical.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think you're technically correct (for the most part); the only reason why we use "electricity" instead of "arcane energy" is because the person who came up with the name had no imagination.

That said, while technically correct, you're wrong.

No, I will not elaborate.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I think you’re technically correct

The best kind of correct!