this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
882 points (86.8% liked)

Political Memes

5612 readers
1970 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Twinklebreeze@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Wasn't the us labor movement violent? I seem to remember something about troops firing on striking miners.

[–] Jaderick@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Mine owners utilized violence and essentially wage slavery to keep miners from unionizing and asking for more fair working conditions. Pinkertons got their reputation as being violent corporate mercenaries in this period, and they continue to be. The violence caused miners to fight back, and when they did the US army got involved usually in the interest of the mine owners. The lead up to the Battle of Blair Mountain is one of the best examples of this and maybe the most impactful.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It was nonviolent, until bosses/police starting shooting miners and their families, at which point it developed into a small-scale civil war. So yes, I shouldn't have simply said blanket non violent I guess... I was just trying to draw a distinction between "let's fight for justice for ourselves" versus "let's storm the capital and do away with the leaders" as two roads (with the first being more effective, and the second often leading to catastrophe instead of the progress that was hoped for.)

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Labor rights and the labor movement throughout history in the US have been incredibly violent so I don't know what revisionist history you're talking about.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You're right, I should amend my comment to note that it wasn't non violent and basically a small-scale civil war

Oh, hang on

(Actually, I do think I should have said it was nonviolent until they started shooting railroad workers, since that one came first. I'm a little fuzzy on the exact chronology but I think that would have been more accurate yes. The person I was responding to just said miners so I said miners.)

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

They would engage in retaliatory violence but the first shot was never fired by the labor organizers