this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
315 points (99.4% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5244 readers
204 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7
315
Shell abandons 2035 emissions target and weakens 2030 goal (www.carbonbrief.org)
submitted 7 months ago by mozz@mbin.grits.dev to c/climate
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I'm surprised someone like Shell would even have such goals. I guess the idea was that it would pay in PR or something, otherwise I don't see why they'd bother.

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 12 points 7 months ago

Is regular old greenwashing. A time-honored advertising strategy.

Never forget that the term "carbon footprint" was invented by a BP ad campaign that had an explicit goal of reframing emissions to an issue of individual responsibility instead of something directly caused by oil companies. Because BP and all the oil companies know that so long as the issue is considered one of individual responsibility we will continue to use fossil fuels until the surface of this planet is inhospitable to life, just letting them get richer since they don't give a damn about down the road consequences.

[–] MrMakabar 1 points 7 months ago

They all have them, it is just usefull to say that they are working really hard on reducing emission. It is just that some minor problems make that really hard. Namely money:

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/big-oils-climate-targets-2023-05-22/