Afaik, whenever an Activitypub instance has defederated from another it has always had to do with some combination of bad user behavior, poor moderation, and/or spam. Are the various instance admins who have decided to preemptively block threads.net simply convinced that these traits will be inevitable with it? Is it more of a symbolic move, because we all hate Meta? Or is the idea to just maintain a barrier (albeit a porous one) between us and the part of the Internet inhabited by our chuddy relatives?

(For my part, I'm working on setting up my own Lemmy and/or Pixelfed instance(s) and I do not currently intend to defederate.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd say the biggest reason is culture and identity. The threadiverse is small at present - about 120k - and the microblogverse is bigger - 8m - but still smaller than the Threads.net 70m already and potential 1bn if meta leverages instagram. Why would a smaller and growing new independent social media platform want to be swamped by a commercial tidal wave? There isn't really a benefit to the independent parts of the Fediverse.

It's better for the independent parts of the fediverse to grow organically, remain independent and grow it's own identity rather than disappear into useless oblivion.

Also if I understand it correctly, the Threads.net is a microblogging site so while they may both use ActivityPub, Lemmy does not support microblog content. For Lemmy, it would mainly be the Lemmy content appearing within Threads.net. Federating with Threads.net is more of an issue for Kbin (which does both Threadiverse and Microblogverse content) and Mastodon (which does Microblogverse content) - the content would be visible in both directions. So for Lemmy it might be a big influx of users so may be manageable, but for Kbin & Mastodon it may also be a flood of content which might not be mangeable. But correct me if I'm wrong on that.

[–] incogtino@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago

I fully agree. I've seen the XMPP EEE analogy used a lot, but I don't think it is the real objection

We've got a nice respectful community, of people who want to see community-driven interaction and sharing succeed - Threads offers nothing we want or need

[–] Tatters@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You said threadiverse a couple of times when I think you meant fediverse.

[–] Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

They sad threadiverse to distinguish it from the microblogiverse, both are part of the fediverse.

Twitter, Instagram, & Mastodon = microblogging.

Reddit, & Lemmy = threaded discussions.