this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
163 points (98.2% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2608 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 21 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I can only see three incidents with 787 on wikipedia:

  • 2013 Boeing 787 Dreamliner grounding
  • 2024 TCAS incident over Somalia
  • LATAM Airlines Flight 800

This does not looks like a repeating pattern. The Flight 800 was a 300ft drop midair with around 30 to 40 people hitting the ceiling of the cabin and landing in Auckland without further problems. This does not sound 787 related. Just keep your seatbelts on.

The 2024 TCAS incident reads like a near collision based on miscommunication by air traffic control. Not related to the 787 series.

And well the 2013 787 grounding was based on lithium-ion batteries problems and has now been fixed (?).

I would say relax and keep your seatbelts buckled (disregarding what airframe you are on).

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

They hit the ceiling and landed in aukland? Damn thats one help of a bump.

[–] livus@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)
  • 50 people were injured including crew

  • 10 were sent to hospital

  • 1 is in a serious condition.

[–] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

True, as it says in the wikipedia I linked. But is has nothing do to with the 787. This could happen to any plane and in fact does happen on many planes in the past and future. A drop because of airpocket and turbulence are very common.

[–] livus@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's the failure to detect and warn people to belt in advance which is the unusual part, and that's what caused most of the injuries.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Is this even detectable ahead of time? The crew has always said to remain buckled while seated from what I remember, even if the seatbelt light is off.

[–] livus@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm a New Zealander so been on a lot of longhaul. Normally you have seatbelts on whenever you're not roaming around.

However, when there's real turbulence the light goes on and the pilot announces return to your seats and stow away tray tables (if no meals are out). Cabin crew then strap themselves in.

[–] kcuf@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You cant always detect turbulence before you run into it

[–] livus@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, but the severity of this event is unusual enough that it's subject to enquiry.

If it does turn out to be equipment failure (and that seems likely given reports of what the pilot said) it's worth knowing about.

[–] kcuf@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Absolutely, there just seems to be some in this thread (I had assumed including yourself after reading your comment) that believed all turbulence could be detected before hand.