this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
163 points (98.2% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2608 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 16 points 8 months ago (10 children)

I'm due to hop on to a 787 later this year. I don't really know how much of a risk I'm taking. This stuff's freaking me out. Are they all sus? Or just on certain airlines or what?

[–] Synthuir@lemmy.ml 35 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The 787 airframe is unrelated to the 737 MAX series, which had the MCAS crashes/door falling off.

That said, I’d never want to fly Boeing, but it’s probably not a realistic worry at this point.

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The 787 has had its share of problems too. Boeing really need to get their act together.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Just give it a few years until Boeing finishes the public beta for the 737 MAX.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

Yeah. The max series seems to be the ones with all the problems, especially the max 8 and newer. If it's not one of those, you should be fine.

[–] notapantsday@feddit.de 24 points 8 months ago

There are a lot of Boeing 787 in the air at any time. You can go to flightradar24.com, click the filter icon at the bottom, add new filter, then aircraft and as ICAO code you just enter B78* and it will show you only this aircraft type.

The risk for an incident with any 787 at any time in the next few years may be higher that it should be. But the risk for one individual plane on one single flight is absolutely negligible. You're more in danger on your way to the airport probably.

[–] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 21 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I can only see three incidents with 787 on wikipedia:

  • 2013 Boeing 787 Dreamliner grounding
  • 2024 TCAS incident over Somalia
  • LATAM Airlines Flight 800

This does not looks like a repeating pattern. The Flight 800 was a 300ft drop midair with around 30 to 40 people hitting the ceiling of the cabin and landing in Auckland without further problems. This does not sound 787 related. Just keep your seatbelts on.

The 2024 TCAS incident reads like a near collision based on miscommunication by air traffic control. Not related to the 787 series.

And well the 2013 787 grounding was based on lithium-ion batteries problems and has now been fixed (?).

I would say relax and keep your seatbelts buckled (disregarding what airframe you are on).

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

They hit the ceiling and landed in aukland? Damn thats one help of a bump.

[–] livus@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)
  • 50 people were injured including crew

  • 10 were sent to hospital

  • 1 is in a serious condition.

[–] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

True, as it says in the wikipedia I linked. But is has nothing do to with the 787. This could happen to any plane and in fact does happen on many planes in the past and future. A drop because of airpocket and turbulence are very common.

[–] livus@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's the failure to detect and warn people to belt in advance which is the unusual part, and that's what caused most of the injuries.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Is this even detectable ahead of time? The crew has always said to remain buckled while seated from what I remember, even if the seatbelt light is off.

[–] livus@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm a New Zealander so been on a lot of longhaul. Normally you have seatbelts on whenever you're not roaming around.

However, when there's real turbulence the light goes on and the pilot announces return to your seats and stow away tray tables (if no meals are out). Cabin crew then strap themselves in.

[–] kcuf@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You cant always detect turbulence before you run into it

[–] livus@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, but the severity of this event is unusual enough that it's subject to enquiry.

If it does turn out to be equipment failure (and that seems likely given reports of what the pilot said) it's worth knowing about.

[–] kcuf@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Absolutely, there just seems to be some in this thread (I had assumed including yourself after reading your comment) that believed all turbulence could be detected before hand.

[–] DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

I won't attempt to assuage your concern with facts, as this is not my area of expertise, but numbers alone are in your favor. Millions to one, at least. "You don't worry about hitting the lottery," is what I try to tell myself. Let us know how it turns out. I wish you good fortune!

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm about to do that in 30 minutes.

No, seriously. Not trying to one up you. It's for work. Otherwise, I would have picked a different flight because I'm paranoid even though I recognize they still have numerous flights daily without issue.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Pretty well! Came into Denver. Bumpy arrival. No issues. Many flights just like this one are successfully completed every day. Nevertheless, I am concerned.

Now if I could do something about the altitude sickness that I'm going to be facing soon.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Cheers loyal lemmy canary.

[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago

Don't worry about it.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Do you ride in a car? You're way more likely to get injured in a car than a plane. I'm not saying it doesn't happen, but these are incredibly rare occurrences. And luckily the airline regulators are super good about preventing previous issues from every happening again.

And I'm sure you won't be able to shut it out of your mind, but it's not worth worrying about for even a minute.

[–] harderian729@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

They're all sus because it's a quality control issue across the board.

You'll probably be fine, but you could also be a sacrifice so some investor/owner can make more money than you could ever dream of.

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago

They are all sus. Boeing is untrustworthy and has proven so many times in the last few years. Find a different plane imo.