Asklemmy

43777 readers

1376 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What media sources have you outgrown, when, and why? (lemmy.world)

submitted 8 months ago by j4k3@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

65 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Do you feel you have outgrown media sources or discontinued them for other reasons?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Television in general. Video in general. A movie is nice now and then, but I almost never seek it out.

[–] pavnilschanda@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I can relate to this. I feel like if a medium relies on getting as many eyes as possible, be it from the studios or even the creators themselves, they aren't as engaging, since I've seen the same thing over and over. I sort of understand, though. Any time-based visual media can spend a lot for its production, so you gotta take in as much as possible to make up for it. Nowadays I read books that don't have as much pressure or certain movies, but that's it.