This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.
-
Be nice to each other.
Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that.
Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.
-
No bigotry or hate.
Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated.
Don't use slurs.
You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body.
The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.
-
Stay on-topic.
Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine.
Don't post literal car fucking.
-
No traffic violence.
Do not post depictions of traffic violence.
NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed.
Gawking at crashes is not allowed.
Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it.
News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed.
Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.
-
No reposts.
Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.
-
No misinformation.
Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned.
False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.
-
No harassment.
Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames.
Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.
Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.
Well yes, but no.
An infinity wide road has no traffic, but the first time you try to connect your magic highway to real exits and local streets, you are stuck again.
By this I'm pointing out that it isn't the road itself causing traffic in isolation, it's the real world bottle necks anywhere this new highway connects to things.
Add in induced demand (people taking new trips) and now you have more people trying to fit down the same offramps, local streets and parking lots than you did in the first place.
An infinitely wide road couldn't be effective unless it was also infinitely long. Cars enter and edit at one edge, and transferring lanes reduces capacity, so adding lanes had diminishing returns.
Indeed, but the width of the highways doesn't create that effect, the logic surrounding "exits at the edge" does. Totally agree with the diminishing returns
More capacity on the roads will make driving a more attractive option to more people, both for journeys they previously made by other means and those that they wouldn't have taken, which leads to more cars on the roads until the congestion is as bad as it was before.
I'm aware of induced demand, but the issue with more drivers simply isn't them inhabiting the new lane, it's the increased population of the highway still trying to use the same offramps, local streets and parking.
It's both.
all you’ve illustrated is that the only place my statement doesn’t apply is in a theoretical (and impossible) fantasy, but you do then go on to explain the means by which what I said is true.
so… thanks?
It's a conversation bro. We agree about some parts and have other thoughts about other parts.
It's not the width of the highway that CAUSES the traffic alone, it's the bottlenecks and access. It's not the induced demand alone that causes the issue, it's the offramps and local streets that ruin the new highway.
I’m pretty sure I thanked you explaining how my initial statement was correct.
and I’m enjoying the conversation, bro. your “other” thoughts seem to be an explanation of how my statement is correct and why.
Ok