this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
438 points (94.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26734 readers
1454 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I understand that modern outer layers are more functional. A leather jacket, for example, can be dressed up or down so as to be worn in a variety of situations. It is also better at keeping you warm.

However, I think capes/cloaks are more aesthetically pleasing garments. It also feels good to have the fabric flowing around you as you walk. But what do you think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

When I read this, I can't help but think of the "no capes" scene from The Incredibles.

In all seriousness, they were a uniquely Roman-area thing (moreso before its fall and people like the Gauls wanted less association with their Roman roots). You just don't associate them with the Chinese, Indians, Incans, etc. I'd wear a cape if they weren't more associated with men, would be cooler than sitting here in a quarter zip sweater over a blue plaid shirt and jeans, some normie I am.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In all seriousness, they were a uniquely Roman-area thing

Capes and cloaks were a thing as recently as a couple hundred years ago.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee -4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I mean Roman-area as in their part of the world, not as in the time period (Roman-era). Capes began with the Greeks and crossed over to the Romans and Byzantines but it would seem never picked up in non-European cultures, and became a lot less common when the two Romes dissolved into a sum of their member states. Joan of Arc didn't even wear a cape, a missed opportunity.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

You can just say "Europe". Nobody calls it "Roman area". Plus it's clearer and more accurate. European fashion trends permeated beyond the historical borders of Rome in some parts of Europe, and yet didn't take off as much in historically Roman parts of the Middle East and North Africa.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I say "Roman area" because it was a Greek/Roman trend before anything else, it was a reference to that. It may have permeated but it never "picked up". It's like saying because there's that one Inuit person wearing an Aztec poncho, it must mean we can say ponchos were a widely encroaching phenomenon.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Ok, but cloaks were a thing in various parts of Europe a couple hundred years ago, so I'm not sure what your point is.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

That they were decreasing and not as much a thing in other places.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

America was still culturally considered an extension of Europe at the time. After independence, capes waned.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"became a lot less common when the two Romes dissolved into a sum of their member states. "

What's your timeline because capes were popular into the 1800's in America which was 600 years after the fall of Constantinople.

1899 Statue of Ulysses Grant with a cape draped over his arm.

https://www.aoc.gov/explore-capitol-campus/art/ulysses-s-grant-statue

Another poster in this thread explained the real reasons. Weather determined it's utility which explains why no Roman capes in ancient Roman controlled Turkey/Israel/Egypt. Capes predate ancient Greece by thousands of years. https://www.iceman.it/en/clothing/ Modern textile manufacturing made it obsolete in northern wet countries.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There is a difference between saying something decreased, saying something is gone, and saying something is ubiquitous or not. Whenever I say they go against the grain in a certain setting, people keep pointing to famous examples of them, as if it's automatically a sign they don't go against the grain. The Greeks and Romans made it standard wear for every officer, which is partially opposed to people post-Rome who lived in the area of Rome and much more as opposed to a place which might have individuals wearing them but where this would be spontaneous and not reflect expectations. Nobody in China, India, even America is going to ask "where is your cape" to someone. Something showing up does not make it expected.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The Greeks and Romans made it standard wear for every officer,

A cape was standard wear for every soldier in the civil war.

"A typical Union soldier uniform during the Civil War consisted of:

light blue pants

blue overcoat with a cape

dark blue jacket

heavy shoes

woolen sock

a cap called a kepi

gray woolen shirt

knapsack"

https://www.civilwaracademy.com/civil-war-uniform#google_vignette

where is your cape” to someone.

No one does now because modern textiles made the cape unnecessary. Capes were standard wear for thousands of years before Greeks and Romans. https://en.natmus.dk/historical-knowledge/historical-themes/the-fur-trail/fur-in-prehistory/#:~:text=4%2D6%20sheepskins%20were%20used,distinctive%20holes%20from%20a%20seam.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Soldiers includes officers. I previously linked US Grant with his trademark cape. Having all soldiers with a cape is even more widespread than just officers despite your claim that it became less popular after Rome fell apart.

Google shows a cape was standard into WW1 and was also standard for WW1 nurses.

It wasn't just military. Capes were regular fashion in the 19th century. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverness_cape

but it would seem never picked up in non-European cultures

Capes were common among many Native American tribes.

Capes were also common in China. https://www.newhanfu.com/2334.html

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but I was talking about actual, run of the mill officers. People here are quick to side with the technicalities, the cape shown in the first link just now is never what I would have any reason to think of. And again, I'm not talking about the "occasional" examples. Nobody is going to conjure that image when thinking of Chinese culture. "Well there was that one thing" is not speaking stereotypically.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, but I was talking about actual, run of the mill officers.

I already explained twice that it was actual run of the mill officers that had capes. And regular soldiers too. Given your claim that capes were only for officers in Rome, capes were much more common in the late 19th century than during the height of Rome.

Everyone wore capes. Every soldier. Every nurse. Regular people going out the city. I linked it once and I'll link it again. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverness_cape https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulster_coat https://www.loc.gov/resource/anrc.18372/ https://onlinemilitaria.net/products/6349-british-and-canadian-wwi-rain-cape/ https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo/capes-of-europe.html?blackwhite=1&sortBy=relevant

That you personally don't imagine Chinese wearing capes, doesn't mean it wasn't typical dress. https://thehanfustory.com/collections/capes-cloaks

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well this would all be news to me if it's true, and I'm not what could be considerably out of the loop.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If it's true??? I linked twice to the wiki article on the Inverness cape. Read it. Capes were a big fashion trend in the late 19th century that went into the early 20th.

As to civil war soldiers, watch Ken Burns Civil War series. It's filled with original photos. You can clearly see the standard issue cape that was part of their uniform in many photos.

https://googlethatforyou.com?q=civil%20war%20cape

Or just watch Gone with the Wind. https://www.pinterest.com/pin/grey-cape-custom-made-for-clark-gable-as-rhett-butler-in-gone-with-the-wind-1939--185703184610650258/

https://www.etsy.com/listing/1263370340/gone-with-the-wind-cape-made-in-the-usa

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I think you're just wearing that look wrong:

You can make almost anything look great, but it's a skill.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

It helps if you look great without wearing anything though. Models can get away with a lot more than most regular people.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago
[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago

I am wearing it like that, but it will never be as cool as capes.