Linux Gaming

15825 readers

68 users here now

Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.

Recommended news sources:

Related chat:

Related Communities:

Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

poVoq

Quintus@lemmy.ml

mudle@lemmy.ml

147

AMD HDMI2.1 proposal rejected by HDMI forum (gitlab.freedesktop.org)

submitted 8 months ago by Atemu@lemmy.ml to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.ml

36 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Alex Deucher:

The HDMI Forum has rejected our proposal unfortunately. At this time an open source HDMI 2.1 implementation is not possible without running afoul of the HDMI Forum requirements.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Doesn't mean displayport can't be used there.

If the tv maker wanted to not pay licensing fees, they could put a displayport on the thing. But they don't. Their call.

[–] Cirk2@programming.dev 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

So the HDMI founders are Philips, Panasonic, Sony and Toshiba Known for their Players and in part TVs. The HDMI Forums consists of the rest of the TV Manufacturers and the big names in component Making (Analog Devices, NXP, Realtek, Qualcomm, etc.). So they are all members of a cooperation dedicated to "encouraging and promoting the adoption and widespread utilization of its Final Specifications". I hesitate to call their decisions on connectivity options unencumbered by interests.

oh btw: Anti-Trust does not require to there be no competing offer, just vast majority of market share.

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oh I know, but I do think anti-trust would require an erection of some sort of barrier. Say, if HDMI required that if HDMI is present, displayport cannot be.

Right now, tv makers are complete free to choose.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

No, that's not required. Microsoft was hit with antitrust despite users being able to install alternative browsers and even operating systems. The problem was that Microsoft was being anti-competitive by making competition more difficult, not that competition wasn't allowed.

You can certainly get a DP-to-HDMI adapter if you want, but that doesn't mean there's no anti-trust happening. If a new TV manufacturer can't reasonably enter the market due to the protocol being overly restrictive for most accessories, I can see that being grounds for an anti-trust case. If they want HDMI to be a standard, it needs to be open. If they don't, they need to provide alternatives in their products.

[–] Thorned_Rose@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago

Not entirely their call. I have little sympathy for the likes of Sony, Samsung et al but they're also beholden to the entertainment industry which is very VERY pro-DRM (and the like). Open Source standards will make it much harder to lock down TVs and make it easier to pirate shit (or, you know, actually fully own your TV and do whatever the fuck you want with it). They won't be dropping those 'calls' any time soon, not unless pissing off the entertainment industry worked out as more profit.