this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
67 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17683 readers
11 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This sounds like something Lemmy would also really benefit from.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Steve@communick.news 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Lemmy has it (or did) already. Some instances use it, many don't.

[–] poVoq 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

No, there is only a very basic option that implements maybe a third of what Pixelfed does now.

[–] ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Is there something more to it that's not highlighted in the linked blog post?

[–] poVoq 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Did you read the entire blog post?

Lemmy's system gives no feedback to applicants at all and is a single input field that offers no guided onboarding what so ever. It's not even a proof of concept compared to what the blog post describes for Pixelfed.

[–] ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Yes, however without experience with Lemmy's implementation, it wasn't clear what the differences were. From what I've read of Lemmy's basic implementation, i.e. submit a reason with your registration/application, this didn't sound that far from it.

As I read it, Pixelfed's request for more information form is a good addition (better than the awkward roundabout way you'd have to handle it otherwise, as I think I recall seeing come up with Lemmy), albeit as it's optional we'll have to see how well it's used in practice.