this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
1349 points (94.4% liked)

Fediverse

28277 readers
952 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I just read this point in a comment and wanted to bring it to the spotlight.

Meta has practically unlimited resources. They will make access to the fediverse fast with their top tier servers.

As per my understanding this will make small instances less desirable to the common user. And the effects will be:

  1. Meta can and will unethically defedrate from instances which are a theat to them. Which the majority of the population won't care about, again making the small instances obsolete.
  2. When majority of the content is on the Meta servers they can and will provide fast access to it and unethically slow down access to the content from outside instances. This will be noticeable but cannot be proved, and in the end the common users just won't care. They will use Threads because its faster.

This is just what i could think of, there are many more ways to be evil. Meta has the best engineers in the world who will figure out more discrete and impactful ways to harm the small instances.

Privacy: I know they can scrape data from the fediverse right now. That's not a problem. The problem comes when they launch their own Android / iOS app and collect data about my search and what kind of Camel milk I like.

My thoughts: I think building our own userbase is better than federating with an evil corp. with unlimited resources and talent which they will use to destroy the federation just to get a few users.

I hope this post reaches the instance admins. The Cons outweigh the Pros in this case.

We couldn't get the people to use Signal. This is our chance to make a change.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tag365@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a Free, Open-Source instant messaging app, the likes of Telegram and WhatsApp, which offers encrypted messaging and most functionality that WhatsApp also offers. It failed to take off as well as we'd hoped since most people resort to iMessage or WhatsApp instead, both owned and controlled by Apple and Zuck respectively.

[–] Tag365@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah it's still available and usable. I use it to communicate with my immediate family, it's a well-built app.

[–] 7802403@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Signal is an encrypted messaging app that got popular during the whole Whatsapp privacy fiasco few years ago.

[–] SpiderShoeCult@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

the secure messaging app that whatsapp is based on. ad-free, facebook-free and encrypted. all the pleasure, none of the pain