this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
807 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59436 readers
4386 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The EU Court ruled that “Backdoors may also be exploited by criminal networks and would seriously compromise the security of all users’ electronic communications. The Court takes note of the dangers of restricting encryption described by many experts in the field.” Any requirement to build in backdoors to encryption protocols for law enforcement agencies could also be taken advantage of by malicious actors.

The EU Court of Human Rights’ also builds on their acknowledgment that “mass surveillance does not appear to have contributed to the prevention of terrorist attacks, contrary to earlier assertions made by senior intelligence officials.”

As the EU Commision’s Chat Control Bill directly targets undermining secure end-to-end encryption, it now looks to be in trouble. In its current version, the Chat Control bill would require the scanning of content on your personal devices, including that which is sent via end-to-end encrypted messenger apps or encrypted email. At some point, providers would be required to either break this encryption to allow the scanning of content or scan content once it has been decrypted and is readable.

On February 13th, Europe received an early Valentine’s gift from the European Court of Human rights when they banned any laws that aims to weaken end-to-end encryption. This ruling is a major stumbling block for the EU Chat Control Bill, but does it really mean that Chat Control is dead? There are many reasons why Chat Control should never become law, we've collected the turn of events and steps you can take to help prevent this dangerous bill from ever being passed!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] danielbln@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'm German you "hit" a decision.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.de 6 points 9 months ago

You could also "meet" it or "wrestle through to" it.

[–] Scribbd@feddit.nl 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'm Dutch and we "come to" a decision.

[–] Arcania85@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We nemen een besluit, we komen tot een overeenstemming.

[–] Scribbd@feddit.nl 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Huh. Misschien zat ik vast in een Dunglish vertaalslag.

Edit: Snelle Google laat zien dat we zeker later tot een besluit kunnen komen. We laten ze ook af en toe vallen. We nemen, geven en breken deze ook.

[–] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We also take decisions. "Besluit nemen". But we also make them... "Een keuze maken" (though this is a different noun, more akin to choice, so I don't know if it counts). Our language is weird.

[–] Scribbd@feddit.nl 1 points 8 months ago

We also "drop" decisions, which means the total opposite of what you would think.

It means a decision has been made.