this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
114 points (95.2% liked)

3DPrinting

15548 readers
296 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

3D prints still suffer from bad layer adhesion due to their 2.5D slicing and printing approach. I investigated if a novel slicing method that interleaves the layer could improve the strength of 3D prints.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kata1yst@kbin.social 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Now we just need half-width extrusions on the outer wall!

[–] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The thumbnail shows a hexagonal tiling, which is like a brick-laying pattern but rotated 90 degrees, so the "half bricks" are on the top and bottom, not the sides.

Maybe it would still work to orient the hexagons so the zig-zag part is on the walls, and then fill in the gaps with half-height half-width walls. Although "half" isn't exactly correct; the hexagons give you ugly trig numbers.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You don't need any ugly trig. You can just use a magic number. The magic number in question is 0.8660254, which is the ratio between the width of the longways (point-to-point) to shortways (flat-to-flat) dimensions of a regular hexagon. If you need half of that, divide it by 2 afterwards.

[–] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

magic ⇏ ¬ugly

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What is that? You do two half widths for each perimeter and it increases strength?

[–] Kata1yst@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Just an offhand idea. If you look at the print in the thumbnail, you can see that while this clever brick-interleaving has eliminated the straight lines along the xy plane, the Z axis still has straight lines. Eliminating that so you have a "brick-interleaving" in all axis seems the most optimal.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Oh, I see what you're getting at, interesting. I hope these land in a slicer sometime, it would be interesting to try out.

[–] tortiscu@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Well you need either that or the video's idea. I think yours could be easier to implement and it requires fewer z-movements (and no reordering, can't remember if the video did that)