Anthropology

646 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to c/Anthropology @ Mander.xyz!

Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.

2023-06-14: We are looking for mods. Send a dm to @fossilesque@mander.xyz if interested!

About

Rules

Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.

Resources

Similar Communities

!openscience@lemmy.ml

Sister Communities

Science and Research

!scicomm@mander.xyz

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

fossilesque@mander.xyz

SciBot@mander.xyz

Study visually captures a hard truth: Walking home at night is not the same for women (phys.org)

submitted 9 months ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/anthropology@mander.xyz

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

An eye-catching new study shows just how different the experience of walking home at night is for women versus men.

The study, led by Brigham Young University public health professor Robbie Chaney, provides clear visual evidence of the constant environmental scanning women conduct as they walk in the dark, a safety consideration the study shows is unique to their experience.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] livus@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah there are some great eye movement tracking studies for people watching scenes from films, they should have made this more like that.

[–] ohitsbreadley@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hey you're that cockroach-milk dude(tte)!

Would also have been great if they included visual stimuli with daylight scenes as controls.

[–] livus@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago

@ohitsbreadley omg cockroach milk, not what I want to be known for lol!

Daylight scenes would be good. I guess given enough funding we would want to control with "safe" environments too eg subject's own home.

The eye movement/film studies were fascinating because there's a ton of theory in film (and art/photography) about where the viewer looks and what the eye is drawn to. And of course the movement studies debunked it.