this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43849 readers
898 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

IMO, Lemmy would gain far more users if you were able to create a user account without having to be approved by a server first.

If communities want to remain invite only that's fine. But I really, really think you guys should decouple account creation from the requirement of being approved by a server. It's a barrier to entry that imo will prevent many users from registering.

Edit: If not global auto-approving of user account creation, I think what would be a more reasonable request is an indicator of whether a server auto-approves account creation or whether it is invite only.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] darkfoe@lemmy.serverfail.party 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Due to the nature of how the protocols work, there needs to be some sort of server attached to an account

[โ€“] jazir5@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Wouldn't it be possible to create server that simply functions as an account registration server as a way to which automatically approves users when they attempt to create an account? That would easily solve the problem. Disallow any posts or interaction, it could just function as a way to register accounts.

Edit: Perhaps that goes too far. Instead, a simple indicator on whether a server allows automatic account registration or not would suffice. Would you guys find that to be an agreeable solution?

[โ€“] darkfoe@lemmy.serverfail.party 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's no central account system with lemmy, so what you're asking for isn't really possible. It's more or less by design choice. Ie, nothing is centralised at all, so no one can shut down the whole fediverse or control its content.

But, an open instance IS possible. Just the software is in its infancy so there are not strong anti-spam measures in place yet, so it may take a bit for someone to put in the effort to run one.

[โ€“] jazir5@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The problem I have with this is it's too high a barrier of entry. There is absolutely no way Lemmy can become a real reddit competitor with an invite only account approval process imo, because any barrier to entry whatsoever will dissuade many users from joining.

[โ€“] Adda@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It is not invite-only. Most instances are approval-only. As I said earlier, as of now, it is a necessary evil.

[โ€“] jazir5@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Approval only, I used the wrong terminology. Apologies.

[โ€“] Adda@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago
[โ€“] darkfoe@lemmy.serverfail.party 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Chances are this will change on some instances once more anti-spam things are put in place.

Don't compare lemmy to reddit directly - think more of the days of internet forums. Lemmy is kind of a return to that with some reddit features I've personally found, and the average person was able to handle registering accounts with that in the past.

[โ€“] jazir5@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Chances are this will change on some instances once more anti-spam things are put in place.

Fair enough!

[โ€“] sexy_peach@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you propose? There were a couple of people here constantly making accounts called hitler_was_awesome and they were posting gore.

[โ€“] jazir5@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Allow subs to have automod functionality that will automatically ban users with usernames containing hate speech or if they make comments that contain hate speech. Reddit has automod functionality, I see no reason lemmy cannot as well. It should be up to the server admins whether they want to implement an automod system if they choose to do so.

[โ€“] sexy_peach@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It should be up to the server admins whether they want to implement an automod system if they choose to do so.

It is. Server admins can do whatever they want.

[โ€“] jazir5@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Then the solution I suggested would already solve the problem you described IMO.

[โ€“] Adda@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If someone implements it on the per-instance basis, it works and is not resource heavy, great. But it will be a while, before someone actually gets there.

[โ€“] jazir5@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] sexy_peach@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

hmm I am not convinced it would work.

Lemmy had a slur filter in the early days, that blocked certain words from being able to be posted, and a lot of people hated that. Dunno why, but well.

[โ€“] jazir5@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

An automod slur filter should be server specific and implemented by the admins who run that server. Decentralization requires that any user can create any account that they want in my opinion. Trying to censor anything is antithetical to Lemmy's stated goal. Lemmy's devs don't have to allow hate speech servers to be discoverable from the join-lemmy site, but banning an account wholesale like this for any reason defeats the purpose of this platform.

[โ€“] sexy_peach@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

but banning an account wholesale like this for any reason defeats the purpose of this platform.

Accounts can't be banned wholesale. They can only be banned by the admins of a server.

[โ€“] Adda@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was. Again, you could do with the slur filter whatever you wanted as an instance admin. And admins of other instances can defederate with your instance for your decision, too.

[โ€“] jazir5@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I fully and wholeheartedly support that. I think the best solution now after some reflection would to just add an indicator the join-lemmy.org server listing page on whether a server automatically approves accounts or if they are invite only. Would that be agreeable to you?

[โ€“] sexy_peach@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was just talking from experience. I believe that the spammer could easily create a new account and then just spam offending images, whatever.

[โ€“] jazir5@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I mean, again, automod could easily be configured to solve that if they build it into the platform. A server being invite only is totally fine to me, reddit has that functionality as well. I fully support the ability to make private servers with account approval processes.

[โ€“] sexy_peach@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, I wouldn't mind a theoretical automod that helped with admin work. I am not against that. I am trying to explain how we arrived at the situation we are at today, where all servers are with application only.

[โ€“] darkfoe@lemmy.serverfail.party 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My guess is once the software matures some some more open instances will pop up. The basics are still being figure out and honed, and with the higher user accounts the past few days admins are already struggling to keep things running. I've seen several of the larger instances go up and down all day (hence why I fired up my own for myself)

[โ€“] jazir5@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Question then, would a viable solution to what I'm suggesting be simply adding an indicator of whether servers auto-approve user account creation or not on the join-lemmy.org site?

[โ€“] darkfoe@lemmy.serverfail.party 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yep! That would be the place for them.

I'm not aware of any open instances that exist at the moment though. Eventually once some automatic moderation tools start developing they'll probably start (slowly) popping up.

[โ€“] jazir5@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago
[โ€“] jazir5@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah as long as there is an indicator of whether a server is an open instance or not would immediately solve the issue I'm describing, for myself at least.

[โ€“] XPost3000@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, had to use an auto-register server for Mastodon cuz I didn't know which servers would actually accept an account request

Fortunately for Lemmy they have a default instance that was pretty fast to get the account on, pretty sure it could go full auto but for the moment they're trying to ward off troll n whatnot

[โ€“] jazir5@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Edit: upon reflection, a much better solution in my eyes would simply be to indicate whether a server auto-approves user account creation on join-lemmy.org or if they are approval only. Would any of you find that to be agreeable?

[โ€“] XPost3000@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I really hope that Lemmy eventually goes auto with account registration on their default instance, but still letting you choose to take a shot at an invite-only instance if you really wanted too

[โ€“] jazir5@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Agreed!

Edit: If not global auto-approving of user account creation across all instances or automatic account registration on the default instance, I think what would be viable is an indicator of whether a server auto-approves account creation or whether it is invite only.