solarpunk memes

2841 readers

18 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

ex_06

tsugu

Track_Shovel

575

In this house, we believe (slrpnk.net)

submitted 9 months ago by j_roby to c/memes

179 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Using your example is the perfect illustration that capitalism isn't good at creating innovation. The market for phones has settled and the market leaders have no reason to use resources to create something new that might even be better. That would risk their money and it'd also risk their dominant position in the market. It's more efficient (if profit is your measure of efficiency) to hinder competition.

If profit isn't the incentive and experimentation is, people will play around with new ideas and create new things, much of which will suck but some won't. Just look at makers online. They invent new things just for the fun of creation. Sure, some profit from viewership online (we've all got to survive and we live in capitalism), but not by focusing on the profit of a product. Occasionally something groundbreaking comes out of those spaces, and frequently they create small innovations that improve things.

The same stuff applies to open source software. Reddit became horrible because it was chasing profit, but now we have Lemmy, Mastodon, and the rest of the Fediverse entirely independent of profit motives.

[–] spookex@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

My problem with my example is with the individuals in our society.

I honestly have no idea why people still want to buy the newest models of phones since they don't really bring anything new to the table.

But, in my opinion, it's a failing of the individuals rather than a failing of an economic model. There really is no negative for a company to release new models with minor updates if there are enough dumbasses that will give them money for it

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 9 months ago

But the model creates incentive to not do something new, which you had an issue with. There's incentive to not shake things up too much. They just produce the same crap each year with a larger number in front, because that's the most profitable thing they can do. It isn't to see what they can change to improve it or create something entirely different.

[–] bane_killgrind@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

They like it and it does something they like, or their old one wore out and it's the most interesting one available.

Is needing a new thing because your old one wore out, "being a dumbass"?

Really you need some help for your depression if you can't imagine other people being happy with something.