this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
117 points (92.7% liked)

Linguistics Humor

1049 readers
1 users here now

Do you like languages and linguistics ? Here is for having fun about it


Share this community: [!linguistics_humor@sh.itjust.works](/c/linguistics_humor@sh.itjust.works)


Serious Linguistics community: !linguistics@mander.xyz


Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

spoileralt text: A two panel comic. In the first panel there are two buttons labeled "I don't believe in prescriptivism" and "'Literally' cannot mean 'figuratively'". A finger hovers between the buttons. In the second panel, the finger's owner is sweating and wiping his brow, unable to decide.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 20 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Take the utilitarian position: the word "literally" is more useful if it is distinct from the word "figuratively", but in most other cases descriptivist definitions are more useful.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I take the pessimist position, which is similar to yours, but I still hate people who don't do what I want.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago

I just get annoyed when people use it in ambiguous context and it creates confusion.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Counterpoint: raw utility is overrated and goofy vibes are much more enjoyable.

[–] Classy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is why English is such a linguistically fucked language now lol

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 months ago

How is English any more or less linguistically fucked than any other natural language?