this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
1084 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59414 readers
3554 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Muso, a research firm that studies piracy, concluded that the high prices of streaming services like Spotify and Apple Music are pushing people back towards illegal downloads. Spotify raised its prices by one dollar last year to $10.99 a month, the same price as Apple Music. Instead of coughing up $132 a year, more consumers are using websites that rip audio straight out of YouTube videos, and convert them into downloadable MP3 or .wav files.

Roughly 40% of the music piracy Muso tracked was from these “YouTube-to-MP3” sites. The original YouTube-to-MP3 site died from a record label lawsuit, but other copycats do the same thing. A simple Google search yields dozens of blue links to these sites, and they’re, by far, the largest form of audio piracy on the internet."

The problem isn't price. People just don't want to pay for a bad experience. What Apple Music and Spotify have in common is that their software is bloated with useless shit and endlessly annoying user-hostile design. Plus Steve Jobs himself said it back in 2007: "people want to own their music." Having it, organizing it, curating it is half the fun. Not fun is pressing play one day and finding a big chunk of your carefully constructed playlist is "no longer in your library." Screw that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I fucking love my selfhosted flac collection! 250gb and growing

[–] VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I don't want to run a server for selfhosting, so I just have my library (about 300GB of mostly OPUS files) On my pc and on a 512GB microSD card in my phone.

I use Foobar2000 on PC and Poweramp on Android.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Yeah sometimes with this self hosting stuff, it's like wow it organizes my music, lets me play it, makes it available to other devices... so does my operating system.

[–] PilferJynx@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Wow, this is my exact setup. Except I have auxio exclusively for audiobooks to keep them away from my random shuffle.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago

There's no need to run a server if you can do the same locally.

Server is useful when you have a lot of devices with limited memory, or want to take advantage of some specific functionality server software may offer.

[–] ZiemekZ@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

OPUS files

Ah yes, a man of culture