this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
278 points (97.0% liked)

News

23301 readers
4135 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Denver police have arrested a 13-year-old boy accused of fatally shooting a man whose leg was blocking the aisle on a public bus.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yes, that would definitely be one of the many, many better arguments for guns than 'protection against bears and mountain lions.'

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Even then, though, you don't need pistols for hunting.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I do know of people who hunt with handguns, but it is definitely rarer. I honestly don't have any issues with hunting if you eat what you hunt. If you just do it to massacre an animal and just leave it where you killed it, fuck you, but I have no issue with responsible hunting practices.

That said, it's my understanding that bow hunting is the fastest, and thus most painless way of killing an animal.

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

That is completely False.
I have shells that will cause a 3 to 4 inch cavitation hole when they hit something causing a large amount of damage and blood loss that will kill with any hit in the chest area.

With a bow, even if you hit the heart it will still take time, especially if you miss and then it is bleeding, suffering, and you have to track it.

At top skill in both I would say it is a tie in that both have the potential to kill instantly, a bow is more likely to harm than kill at lower skill levels though.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Fair enough. I'm not a hunter. That's just something I've been told before.

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes but you'd struggle to get close enough to make a reliably good shot. Ranged shots are what rifles are for.

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Most of the things I’ve shot in my life with the rifle I was close enough I could’ve done it with a pistol.

We hunt in forests around here not plains.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Pistol shooting practice is typically done at no more than 25 yards, while hunting rifles can more comfortably do a longer range. Sure, you can hit with a pistol at similar ranges (especially with a larger caliber as you propose) but rifles are better for controlling the recoil and typically more accurate. If the goal is to actually hit, and in particular kill painlessly, a rifle is the better tool.

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

I think the farthest shot I have had was maybe 35 yards.

You basically find a good trail and put up a blind or stand near it.

We have to cut our own firing lanes so short distances are much preferred. Lol

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Tbf I carry a rifle any time I go in the woods damn near.

I love nature but am terrified of bears and I want a big firecracker, if it comes down to trying to use it on a bear that wants to fight I am probably already fucked and I know that.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

If it makes you feel more secure, I won't judge you, but you should know that-

Statistics suggest there have been over 180 fatal bear attacks in North America since 1784. While the majority of these fatal attacks have been carried out by wild bears, some are the result of bears held in captivity.

https://blog.batchgeo.com/bear-attack-statistics/

In contrast-

over 100 people drown every year in bathtubs.

https://www.cpsc.gov/Newsroom/News-Releases/1975/CPSC-Releases-New-Study-On-Bathtub-And-Shower-Injuries

[–] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Statistics like this are bunk. If I'm camping in the forest my chances of having a bad encounter with a bear are astronomically higher than drowning in a bathtub. Context is everything when it comes to your specific risk profile.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Except your chances of having a bad encounter with a bear are almost zero. Because bears almost never attack humans. Which is the point.

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh I recognize that it is completely irrational.

It is just a childhood fear that I can’t beat.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough. Like I say, I'm not judging you. If that's what you need to feel secure, that's what you need to feel secure.

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

I don’t mean it that way, I was just acknowledging that I know it doesn’t make sense. lol

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 6 points 9 months ago

An activity where you would definitely supervise the child, not send them off on their own on a bus.

[–] ratman150@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Dawg there are so many ways to hunt that don't involve a bang.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Hey man, not cool to talk about my dating experience that way.

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

I know, I own those too.

My bow may be twenty years old but it kills just as good now as then.

[–] BingoBangoBongo@midwest.social -4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Manlier ways to hunt. That's how you get to them. Guns are for sissies, bows are for real men.

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I have both and they both have their advantages and disadvantages.

I prefer my rifle because it has a much much higher chance of a clean quick kill.

Personally if you are willing to let an animal suffer more to be more “manly” you were never manly at all.

[–] BingoBangoBongo@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago

I don't do either. I'm primarily vegetarian because I know I wouldn't want to kill an animal irl so I just generally avoid meat all together.