this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
73 points (79.7% liked)
World News
32241 readers
830 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Serious question: what would these fighter planes actually do in such situation?
I guess they could shoot the airliner down if it starts flying toward any towers.
But that wasnt the threat. They were going to stop him from blowing up the plane by.... blowing up the plane.
There is a difference between the plane being blown up over London, or shot down over farm fields
By blowing up the plane before it can blow up and whatever else it hits.
In theory, the threat could have just been a bluff to gain control of the plane.
bluffing a threat to the plane by snapchatting your friend would be a weird move. No one on the plane even knew a "threat" was made.
It seems like "we have no details at all about the threat (because it wasn't actually credible), so let's just be prepared for every situation" is the logic.
Yup, some higher up will make the call to shoot it down before more damage can be made.
They'd get a really big megaphone and tell the pilot "Pull over!"
jk, they'll just fire a Sidewinder missile at it if it deviates from its flight path.
Guessing it gives them information on what is actually happening on the plane. If the pilots were being held against their will they could be following orders from a hijacker.
Sounds logical.