I think there's no question that the plane has been downed by Ukraine. The only thing that's not been confirmed is whether the IL-76 was carrying POWs (though, given the fact that it was flying over Belgorod, what else would it be carrying? The IL-76 has the radar cross-section of a whale), but delivery of POWs to Belgorod airport by IL-76 is standard practice according to previous prisoner exchanges.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Telegram is going to be Telegram, but there is a bit of debunking going on there. (... if you even want to call it debunking. Telegram channels are extremely biased and quickly spread rumors, true or not.)

A passenger manifest for the plane was released and supposedly most of the Ukrainians on that list were traded months earlier.
Russians have quarantined the crash site and are not providing proof that Ukrainians were on the plane.
Only one body is shown amid the wreckage area, which is unusual for a plane that was supposed to be filled with prisoners.

That's the current gossip, anyway. If it's true or not, we will not actually know for a bit.

[–] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Afaik that passenger manifest was revealed to be fake. Telegram going to Telegram, so YMMV.

Current theory is that Russians told Ukrainian general staff that there was going to be a prisoner exchange that would be delivered by IL-76, but miscommunication led to nobody on the ground getting the news. I don't believe Ukrainian AD was acting out of malice.

We know a prisoner exchange was supposed to happen at the border near Belgorod, we know IL-76s were used to transport POWs in the past, and we also know Ukraine shot down the IL-76. We also know Russia doesn't usually operate IL-76 so close to the Ukrainian AD umbrella, so...

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah, Telegram is an interesting place for that sweet, sweet hit of confirmation bias dopamine.

[+] morry040@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sushko is well-known for spreading propaganda. If you wouldn't take news from RT, don't take it from Sushko.

[–] morry040@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't call it propaganda or even news - it's just theories at this stage.
What we can speculate about is motive to deceive. Russia has been incurring some notable losses from Ukrainian anti-air defences recently, so there would be a motive from the Russian side to portray those anti-air defences as either ineffective or untrustworthy so as to try and sway public opinion about its use.

Claiming that POWs were onboard the plane aligns with that motive but it also raises questions such as:

The plane was reportedly shot down after taking off from Belgorod, so if it was carrying POWs away from Belgorod, what was the intended destination? It doesn't seem logical that Russia would fly from Belgorod into Ukraine (unless they were stupid or taking the risk).
Why not transport POWs to Ukraine by road or rail, given that Kharkiv is only a 90 min drive away?

[–] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

The plane was quite clearly not taking off from Belgorod. Like I said, Sushko is entirely unreliable and does zero vetting of his "sources." His translations are notoriously poor.
The flight was entering Belgorod, which follows typical Russian POW exchange procedure according to the NYT. An IL-76 is used to deliver POWs to a nearby city, and they are then shuttled by bus to the border.

But also, if Ukrainian radars can't tell the difference between a fucking IL-76 and a Su-34 or cruise missile, what the fuck man. Their radar signature isn't even in the same order of magnitude.