this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2023
21 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17710 readers
5 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml
wakest@lemmy.ml
21
Should separate instances of Lemmy be topic-based? What else, if not? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 years ago by cyclohexane@lemmy.ml to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I suppose this may make sense in the case of something like Mastodon. But something as versatile and customizable as lemmy, which allows for the existence of separate topic-based communities, makes topic-based instances of lemmy not necessary.

Instead of making a new instance for a certain topic, it is usually a much better approach to just create a new community on my current lemmy instance. At least from my perspective as a user.

I find the only exception to this is censorship and moderation. If I, for any reason am unhappy with an instance's moderation and censorship, then that is the only potential reason I can see to change and make my own.

What does everyone else think of this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yep, one example was gtio.io, which occasionally had a decent topic or two, but about a third of the userbase was from lemmy.ml and another third from wolfballs.com (the former instance which attracted a political 'right-wing' userbase). Since lemmy.ml defederated from wolfballs.com, you wouldn't even see most of the replies from a lemmy.ml account and have to get an extra account somewhere to reply.

Of course, those replies were almost always low-quality garbage, but I did want to see and reply to them!