this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
678 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4063 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Something you’ve probably heard by now is that the Republican Party’s decision to decimate reproductive rights—and celebrate the overturning of Roe v. Wade like it was the greatest thing to ever happen to America—has not gone over great with voters. The 2022 midterm elections, which were supposed to be a red tsunami for the GOP, were anything but: Democrats picked up a seat in the Senate and Republicans just barely took back the House, with voters in critical states citing abortion as the most important issue of the day. A year later, the right to an abortion was enshrined in Ohio’s state constitution; Kentucky voters reelected pro-choice governor Andy Beshear; and Democrats took control of Virginia’s state legislature, preventing the GOP governor from limiting abortion moving forward, which he’d planned to do. The results were unambiguous: The American people want abortion rights.

Now, with the 2024 election less than a year away, what are Republicans running for higher office to do? According to GOP strategist and Donald Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway, the answer is simple: make their campaign slogan something like, “Yeah, we took away your reproductive rights, but, hey, we’re letting you keep contraception, and that’s something!”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 78 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Ooh, someone finally realized current polling is way off from the actual results at the voting booth.

The #GOP finally caught the car, now they are getting pulled under the tire.

I'm looking forward to the GOP joining the Know-Nothings in the trash bin of history.

[–] Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world 57 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

The number is 10k per day.

I did the math a few years ago because I couldn't find anyone else who had published it. This is rough and IANAM (mathmagicman).

Every single day 8,000 boomers and above die, and 12,000 people turn 18 and those numbers are actually accelerating. If you use existing data to estimate conservative/liberal and likely voters within those groups it works out to a delta of 10,000 per day on a national scale. That's 5,000 votes switching every single day. That might not seem like alot. Because it really isn't. Out of 155 million votes cast, 10,000 is .006 percent. But here's the thing. It's cumulative. And it just doesn't stop. It is relentless. it's 300k a month, 3.6 million per year. And that pace is accelerating. Between 2020 and 2024 it's a 15 million vote difference. By 2028 it's 30 million. It used to be that people age into conservatism. But that is not happening with millennials. The demographics are changing, and changing quickly. The most conservative group in the country is dying. While the most liberal group is rising.

We just have to hold on to democracy for a few more years. This will all be behind us. Another 10k today.

[–] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 44 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This isnt even factoring in the mass extinction event that was the covid pandemic. At first it hit everyone equally but once the vaccine came out and they decided to die on their stupid little hill the numbers skewed disproportionately towards the unvaccinated being the ones impacted in subsequent waves. We have confirmed this now in a few studies and I saw it first hand working in the emergency department.

That absolutely accelerated the trend you're describing and I think they are just now realizing that the maga train is careening towards its demise and their bold strategy to worship a conman is going to cost them everything.

This year will be the final deciding factor on that. If we can rid ourselves from trump we can prove that there is still hope for this nation. I'm not so naive to think that there won't be a new conman to take his place and we won't find ourselves in an endless fight. But if we can't stop trump and he somehow gets back in power then there's absolutely no hope for this nation.

[–] Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I completely agree. And although some polls indicate Trump strength, Biden hasn't begun yet. The campaign hasn't started. When it does, I really think it's a clear Trump defeat.

And that doesn't even take into account how polling landlines introduces a huge sampling bias. I have my cell phone set on do not disturb unless you're in my contact list. Most tech savy people don't answer unknown numbers.

They know it. The powers that be realize Trump is unelectable.

[–] Granite@kbin.social 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I love the math, but this assumes that all people vote. And we know Republicans have been attacking the voting rights of people for decades now and that too is accelerating.

They have to cheat to win even now.

[–] Damionsipher@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They literally started their math is based on voting population in their post. Sure, this doesn't account for cheating, but the Dems are also making headway on minimizing gerrymandering in a lot of swing states.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not to mention, gerrymandering straight up stops working once the demographics are so skewed that it can’t compensate for them any longer. I just hope we can keep this place a (small-d) democracy long enough for that to happen.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago

Not only does it stop working, it becomes insurmountable for the party that did the gerrymandering.

You'll soon see GOP House reps suing to toss out maps they created.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

cheating

You counting the coups planned too?

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

Um, the correct term is "Mathemagician." /j

But I agree that if we can hold on long enough and not slide into apathy, we can outlast the Conservatives.

[–] geekworking@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Potential problems with your theory are that old people voting percentage isn't way higher than young people and that people tend to get more conservative as they age.

The boomers were the ones out protesting the Vietnam War and fighting for civil rights. Now they are the establishment and behaving the same as those who they protested in their youth.

Hopefully, the batshit craziness will die down, but there will be new conservatives to replace the ones who die off.

[–] Velonie@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

People tend to get more conservative as they gain wealth and have something to conserve, hence that trend not continuing for millennials as of yet

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

This is the real answer. And it makes sense too. Also, your formative years impact your beliefs. Gen X is increasingly conservative, even though they're stuck in the same crap as millennials. They grew up in the "greed is good" 80s.

https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/first-read/poll-gen-x-gen-z-take-different-political-paths-rcna66264

Notice how millennials are the least conservative generation by far? That's what comes from being shit on by the economy for years.

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

people tend to get more conservative as they age.

My father has been telling me this for decades. When I was 18, he said that I'd become a conservative at 21. In my 20's, he said I'd become a conservative in my 30's. In my 30's, it was in my 40's. Now that I'm 48, he says that I'll become a conservative "when I get older." (I guess he got tired of updating the date.)

Meanwhile, if anything, I'm getting more liberal. If you asked me in 2010 about gay marriage/marriage equality, I probably would have answered "marriage is for men and women, gay people should be allowed to have civil unions, though." Obviously, that's not my current position. Now, I think any two consenting adults should be allowed to marry (with very few exceptions - e.g. cases of incest). I didn't get more conservative as I aged, I got more liberal.

Furthermore, if people get more conservative as they age, how does one explain Bernie Sanders?

Yes, some people get stuck in the past and can't keep up, but there isn't a hard and fast rule that says people move to the right as they age.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Same boat. I went from teenage Libertarian to European style Socialism please.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The boomers were the ones out protesting the Vietnam War and fighting for civil rights. Now they are the establishment and behaving the same as those who they protested in their youth.

Neither of my parents did. Same goes for my step-father, even though he was a self-proclaimed "hippy" as a young man.

A lot of those neo-progressive protesters didn't survive / keep voting rights into the 2020's for various reasons, intentional & otherwise.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 10 months ago

and that people tend to get more conservative as they age.

I don't think that's particularly accurate. I don't think people radically change their political ideology after reaching adulthood. Rather, the political spectrum shifts around them.

I would say that today's progressives are yesterday's radicals, and tomorrow's conservatives.

I like to think we have two progressive parties, just one is lagging the other by about 60 years.

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

That's basically where they are in California. No GOP candidate has won a state-wide seat in a long time and in the legislature they seem to be permanently in the minority.

[–] aew360@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I just can’t wrap my head around how the party survived the Bush administration. Oh wait, propaganda. Thats how

[–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

And racial hatred