this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
197 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37724 readers
527 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Their argument for "safety" always bothered me, their app store is full of garbage and malware. They just want their 30% cut.

[–] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And even if the App Store was perfectly safe, keeping users safe via restricting basic functionality instead of increasing tech literacy is a backwards approach

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Google requires a full reformat to 3rd party apk installs on Chromebooks. That's heavy-handed, cumbersome, and idiotic. But it's still
better than Apple.

It should be as easy as sudo apt-add repository, sudo apt-get update, sudo apt-get install everywhere.

[–] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago

Chromebooks are even worse: "Instead of hampering user's computers for safety, we'll make a 'computer' that just launches our proprietary web apps!"

[–] unrelatedkeg@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 10 months ago

I mean if they want their safety they can feel free to keep it. No need to limit others to the App Store.