this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
197 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37727 readers
574 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 57 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The fact that letting users choose what software they'd like to install wasn't seen as an fundamental part of a computer really highlights Apple's backwards philosophy towards user experience.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And the cult followers will foam from their mouths and defend that it's better if you have less choice for some myth of security.

[–] Eggyhead@kbin.social 22 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I’d say the cult Apple haters are generally more toxic in their language and aggressive in gate-keeping.

[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Sure because the things Apple has done has totally screwed over non Apple users too..

Also, Apple's success basically depended on deceiving the public. The perfect example was the Mac vs PC ads which were designed to mislead people into believing Mac's can't crash and can't get viruses

Another more recent example is iMessage which is designed to lock Apple users into their OS.

The only reason they dropped lightning for USBC even was because of laws

They're boasting about privacy, when literally earning billions from Google for making them the default search (so they're selling your details to Google basically)

Even now, developers are forced to buy Mac's to develop for iOS. So of course many of them will be annoyed.

I even had a apple sales manager scold me publicly when I sold macs (a week before bootcamp was released) that nobody would want to run windows on a mac, and basically implied I was an idiot for doing it. Two weeks later he returned and boasted about how macs could now run Windows. No apology.

Apple is a toxic company (even Steve Jobs was a TERRIBLE person who apparently used to park in the disabled parking every day). There's plenty of reasons not to like them. And thats only a tiny list..

The technical team there I met were awesome.. But the sales side stinks from the top down..

[–] Eggyhead@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

My reply was meant to bring attention to the behavior of some community members, not Apple the company. Sorry if there was a misunderstanding.

Feel free to not buy Apple products if you don’t like them. It’s your choice and I really don’t care.

[–] ram@bookwormstory.social 2 points 10 months ago

"Cult Apple haters" is a goofy phrase and doesn't exist. Maybe people who swear off / boycott Apple, but a cult? Goofy.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Gate keeping by calling out BS and anti customer business practices? Interestingly definition of gate keeping you have.

[–] Eggyhead@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Absolutley! Even more “interesting-ly” than that straw-man of yours, friend! ;)

FYI, calling out Apple’s anti-competitive bs is not at all a problem. In fact, many Apple users are plenty happy to do that themselves. The problem is with how haters behave toward the users of Apple products, rather than the company itself.

[–] PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Their argument for "safety" always bothered me, their app store is full of garbage and malware. They just want their 30% cut.

[–] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And even if the App Store was perfectly safe, keeping users safe via restricting basic functionality instead of increasing tech literacy is a backwards approach

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Google requires a full reformat to 3rd party apk installs on Chromebooks. That's heavy-handed, cumbersome, and idiotic. But it's still
better than Apple.

It should be as easy as sudo apt-add repository, sudo apt-get update, sudo apt-get install everywhere.

[–] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago

Chromebooks are even worse: "Instead of hampering user's computers for safety, we'll make a 'computer' that just launches our proprietary web apps!"

[–] unrelatedkeg@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 10 months ago

I mean if they want their safety they can feel free to keep it. No need to limit others to the App Store.

[–] ScaredDuck@sopuli.xyz 13 points 10 months ago

"What's a Computer?"