this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
775 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59106 readers
4410 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sestren@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

For daily use, sure - but it completely excludes itself as an option for road trips in the US and parts of Canada. There's a stretch of interstate road near me with nearly a 100 mile gap between service stations.

I know that this isn't the purpose of this battery, but it's a valid reason why a lot of people might be hesitant to buy one. Many people can't afford multiple vehicles for different purposes. You have the car you drive to work with, and if you happen to go on a trip you just use the same thing.

Maybe 99% of use occurs within constraints that this battery can handle, but if you can only afford one vehicle, then this is still a pretty suboptimal option. That being said... it could still be cheap enough to not matter. I didn't see any mention of price in that article.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If 99% is covered by this then cover your last 1% by renting a vehicle has that ever occurred to you ?

[–] MethodicalSpark@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I agree with your logic. It makes perfect sense to rent a vehicle for edge cases.

However, I disagree that you’re going to encourage mass adoption by asking people to change their lifestyle. A large amount of the US population views their vehicle as more than a tool to get to and from work. It’s an extension of their personality. Road trips might be part of that personality.

They’re sold on the marketing ideals of luxury, comfort, or adventure. They buy accessories for these vehicles like roof-racks for their luggage or campers/trailers to help them travel across the country while keeping that comfort of home. Tens of thousands of campers are still sold in the U.S. every year and EV’s are a nonstarter for towing more than 75 miles.

No one enjoys renting an unfamiliar Honda CR-V where the seat doesn’t feel quite right for long periods of time, there’s something sticky on the shift handle, the previous driver smoked in it, and you hear a plastic creaking sound coming from the back seat. You can’t quite figure out from where and it’s driving you insane.

Until EV’s can match the convenience and capability of ICE vehicles, adoption is going to be limited.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

If we can't convince people that we need to change habits then we are doomed anyway, switching to BE cars is not a viable solution we need to increase public transportation and cycling anyway

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

average american has two vehicles. Its literally not even a lifestyle change: one EV, one hybrid or gas vehicle will cover 100% of normal use cases. EVs have lower maintenance costs and longer predicted life spans and don't waste as much energy in stop and go traffic. They are superior commuter vehicles.

The problem is vehicle fleets. Trucks and busses will be hard to replace effectively and they mostly need longer discharge cycles and ranges.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe we have to settle for suboptimal solutions from time to time to save the planet?

[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That’s not how car sales work. People want EVs without major downsides. Until that’s what’s available we won’t be see EVs surpass 10% market share.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I know, people are not willing to comprises for the good of the planet. That's why we're so fucked.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They should raise the driving age to 30. Then people would understand what a privilege driving really is.

[–] krakenx@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

A solution to this would be an extra expansion battery that you could buy or rent as an add-on only when needed.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 39 points 10 months ago (2 children)

...or rent a vehicle with the fuel savings from driving your EV most of the year, and skip putting a couple thousand km on your car over a long weekend.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

This is what I do.

[–] Buttons@programming.dev 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

You still pay the cost of driving a car a couple thousand km though, right?

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Most rental places in the states don't charge mileage iirc

[–] Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago

If we're going all in with expansion packs we should add a rumble pack as well 😏

[–] greenmarty@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

or don't buy city car for intercity trips. Get li-ion powered cars or wait for them to make model with bigger range.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 months ago

Just use Communauto for those once a quarter out of town trips.

[–] greenmarty@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It seems to me that car in the article is relatively small city car. I can imagine that building bigger car with inter city travels in mind would also include an improved range.