this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
337 points (95.4% liked)
Asklemmy
43939 readers
671 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah, they were just shot. There's footage of the bodies on the street, by the way.
So now you're moving goalposts - it's no longer about whether or not people got killed, but whether you find it justified that they died? I'm sorry, but unless we're talking about a literal Nazi, I can't agree with that sort of view.
He stated that the idea that China denies it is false. They have successfully integrated the event into their national narrative. Party members openly speak about Tianenem Square and use it as a lesson for how to better govern going forward
Was it a brutal crackdown on protests? Somewhat, yes. But soldiers also defected and sided with the protesters, and the protestors also killed some soldiers.
It's a complicated event and an important part of modern Chinese history. Yet most people only learn a tiny part of it and assume the rest.
The book series "three body problem" by a Chinese author started the process of opening by mind about this stuff. In this book, he openly criticizes the cultural revolution and anti-intellectualism in the Chinese government during that time period.
I thought all forms of dissent were banned. But it turns out the party today doesn't see itself as the same as before. So while you can't criticize the current one, the one from 30 years ago is fair game.
There's a lot to say here about the US perception of China versus China in actuality. Propagqnda is powerful and fills in the cracks for what people don't know and seems unusual to them.