this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2023
20 points (88.5% liked)
Tree Huggers
615 readers
2 users here now
A community to discuss, appreciate, and advocate for trees and forests. Please follow the SLRPNK instance rules, found here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ok, not so bad. There was work being done on trees that were thought to be Darling 58, but were actually Darling 54. So maybe that work will have to be redone on Darling 58 trees?
My understanding is that there were enough mistakes like that for the project funding to be cut
Was the funding cut? The ACF has stopped backing the project, but I think that was a political and organizational backing, not necessarily financial.
Yeah, and funding dictates the pace of work.