this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
599 points (93.1% liked)

Technology

58180 readers
4688 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I wouldn't say they're quite dead in the water but he definitely has plenty of power to enshitify them.

He already shut off the Ukraine from starlink when he felt like it.

Tit for tat Disney and Tesla.

If he fucks with SpaceX though, NASA can just stop dealing with them. They would go real quick from being profitable to begging for people to use their service.

If he starts getting a lot of back pressure from the EU and US on what he can launch, I can put a serious dent in his wallet.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

"when he felt like it" isn't exactly correct, he specifically didn't allow them to use starlink to launch attacks on Russia, as it was meant to be used only for defense.

[–] c0c0c0@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean, if you're being invaded, doesn't anything you do to fight back count as "defense"?

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Not according to the USA initially

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

The problem is, none of us have real knowledge about what happened there. All we have is conjecture and/or propaganda.

It's equally reasonably possible that he has ties in Russia.

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

SpaceX has never been a good investment for NASA.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Not necessarily SpaceX but they needed something.

The problem with NASA is that the funding waxes and wains with the administrations, as does the demands of the administrations to give them the money.

If something takes more than 8 years to happen chances are the project never comes to fruition. NASA has really slowed down in development in recent decades.

Not all the innovation SpaceX is doing is really warranted, though most of it's kind of cool. But they are investing in research and development in places that NASA simply can't get to.

Starlink is just a way for spacex to capitalize on that research and development. They are their own sister company customer.

That said they can all turn into dog shit in a matter of months if somebody got a stick up their butt

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

You can? Because he already has. Please do!