this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
46 points (97.9% liked)

Games

16723 readers
542 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
46
Chris Avellone: This is true. One of the Elder Scrolls proposals (which I pitched) was intended to serve the same function as FNV did between F3 and F4 to provide more adventures in the in the setting (twitter.com)
submitted 11 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

NItter link: https://nitter.net/ChrisAvellone/status/1736609878133850431

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Not surprisingly, it didn't gain much traction - I never got the impression Beths. was happy with FNV's reception (good and bad).

Getting absolutely humiliated by Obisidian's spin off game being miles better than their mainline games couldn't possibly have been the reason, right? /s

[–] Dirk_Darkly@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's a bit wild how petty Bethesda comes off as. It's like they'd rather spend a bunch of money to convince people their games are still good instead of, you know, trying to make good games.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Maybe compared to the stuff that came after it.

I wouldn't describe FNV as being miles better than FO3. If anything I see just as many that prefer one as the other. And I don't think they're upset with the comparative success Skyrim has had.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 11 points 11 months ago

It we're judging them as RPGs then I think it is absolutely fair to say New Vegas is miles better. If we're judging writing and world building likewise.

I think an argument could be made for Fallout 3 having more interesting environments to aimlessly roam due to the signature Bethesda world design and clutter. But that's more or less it, in my opinion.

Whether that makes it a better game is up to individual preferences. I definitely have heard of people who prefer FO3, but I also know the modding scene of New Vegas is magnitudes stronger (though that doesn't necessarily have to mean it's the more popular game, granted).

[–] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t describe FNV as being miles better than FO3.

I mean, you're entitled to your opinion ~~even if it's absolutely wrong~~.

[–] DistractedDev@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I am one of the few who thinks FO3 is miles better than FNV

[–] ayaya@lemdro.id 3 points 11 months ago

Watch hbomberguy's Fallout 3 video and see if you feel the same way afterwards.