this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
994 points (99.1% liked)

News

23266 readers
3658 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

At least 1,201 people were killed in 2022 by law enforcement officers, about 100 deaths a month, according to Mapping Police Violence, a nonprofit research group that tracks police killings. ProPublica examined the 101 deaths that occurred in June 2022, a time frame chosen because enough time had elapsed that investigations could reasonably be expected to have concluded. The cases involved 131 law enforcement agencies in 34 states.

In 79 of those deaths, ProPublica confirmed that body-worn camera video exists. But more than a year later, authorities or victims’ families had released the footage of only 33 incidents.

Philadelphia signed a $12.5 million contract in 2017 to equip its entire police force with cameras. Since then, at least 27 people have been killed by Philadelphia police, according to Mapping Police Violence, but in only two cases has body-camera video been released to the public.

ProPublica’s review shows that withholding body-worn camera footage from the public has become so entrenched in some cities that even pleas from victims’ families don’t serve to shake the video loose.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)
  • Claim that reform will do thing.

  • Reform fails to do thing.

  • Cries of surprise from assembly.

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The problem is that the reform was supposed to add accountability. But if the public can't access the footage and police are free to "accidentally" turn their bodycams off before or "oopsie woopsie I deleted the footage" after they break the law there's zero accountability, and therefore no meaningful reform.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

are you saying police cams are useless, or that the police are purposefully obstructing justice by blocking the footage. im confused

[–] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Your second question solves the first.

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, no it doesnt. The first question questions wether body cams are useful, the second questions wether people are flawed.

If question 1 has an awnser of "yes" ( which it does ), than that means they can be used as ammunition in a case against the police or officers in question in what they did, even if the footage goes "missing". It puts the responsability on the police infrastructure.

[–] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Incorrect.

Police are purposefully obstructing justice by blocking the footage (making) police cams useless.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah and there’s an easy solution here: presume that the officer is in the wrong when no body cam footage is able to verify their story. All it takes is actual accountability and forcing the police to see these tools as aiding them in proving their innocence instead of looking to prove their guilt.

And yeah it’ll take a lot of cops in prison to click

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

^ exactly what i was getting at :)

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Usually the reform doesn't really fail, it does exactly what it's supposed to do. The issue is how the reform is made or formulated in the first place.