Technology

59340 readers

5442 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

895

Their Bionic Eyes Are Now Obsolete and Unsupported (spectrum.ieee.org)

submitted 11 months ago by yesdogishere@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

232 comments fedilink hide all child comments

These early adopters found out what happened when a cutting-edge marvel became an obsolete gadget... inside their bodies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

They exist to make money not help humanity.

From the article...

Greenberg spent many years developing the technology while working at the Alfred Mann Foundation, a nonprofit organization that develops biomedical devices

EDIT: For those challenging what I am saying, I was speaking towards his motives, when I responded to this comment …

They exist to make money not help humanity.

I was challenging the notion that he did not care about humanity, and just wanted the money.

Its ok to want to help others AND make money doing it. (Unfortunately) We live in a society where money is needed to exist.

EDIT2: I'm all for open source.

[–] Bahalex@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

“he spun off the company Second Sight with three cofounders in 1998”

The rest of the sentence from your quote. The company that put these implants into people was, from what I understand, indeed for profit.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Kind of hard to operate a company without also making money doing so. The two are not mutually exclusive to each other.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

He should have made it open sauce

[–] eksb@programming.dev 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Non-profits, just like for-profits, need to keep revenue at or above expenditures. Just like for-profits they end up run by executives who prioritize bringing money in to sustain the bureaucracy over doing good.

[–] guacupado@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Feel free to enlighten them on how to run a beneficial company with no income.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Government grants... A là Lockmart.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Just like for-profits they end up run by executives who prioritize bringing money in to sustain the bureaucracy over doing good.

I'm going to push back against this part of your comment. You are making an assumption. You can do both, help Humanity AND make money (since we live in a society that requires money to exist).